Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

CC/90/2013

S.Rami Reddy, S/o S.Venkata Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), - Opp.Party(s)

P.Siva Sudarshan

18 Mar 2015

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/90/2013
 
1. S.Rami Reddy, S/o S.Venkata Reddy
Retired Manager in Co-Op. Central Bank, R/o Flat No.205, Brindavan Pride, Near Brain and Heart Hospital, Kurnool 500 002.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension),
O/o The Employees Provident Fund Organisation, D.No.1/30, R.S.Road, Cuddapah 516 004.
Kadapa
Andhra Pradesh
2. The General Manager, District Co-Op. Central Bank,
H.No.46-1-C, Opp. Eye Hospital, Kurnool 518 002.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.Y.Reddeppa Reddy, M.A., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER’S FORUM: KURNOOL

Present: Sri.Y.Reddappa Reddy, M.A., L.L.M., President,

And

Smt. S.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L., Member

Wednesday the 18th day of March, 2015

C.C.No.90/2013

Between:

S.Rami Reddy, S/o S.Venkata Reddy,

Aged about 59 Years,

Retired Manager in Co-Operative Central Bank,

R/o Flat No.205, Brindavan Pride,

Near Brain and Heart Hospital,

Kurnool-500 002.                                                                    …Complainant

 

-Vs-

 

1.       Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension),

          O/o Employees Provident Fund Organization,

        D.No.1/30, R.S.Road, Cuddapah-516 004.

 

2.       The General Manager,District Co-Operative Central Bank,

          H.No.46-1-C, Opp. Eye Hospital,

          Kurnool-518 002.                                                 …OPPOSITE PARTIES

 

 

       This complaint is coming on this day for orders in the presence of Sri.P.Siva Sudarshan, Advocate for complainant and opposite party No.1  In-Person (K.Siva Rami Reddy) and opposite party No.2 called absent and set exparte and upon perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

DOCKET ORDER

(As per Sri. Y.Reddappa Reddy, President)

C.C.No.90/2013

 

          The counsel for complainant filed a memo to permit him to withdraw the complaint and permitted.  Hence complaint is closed as withdrawn but without costs.  These orders are not going to take away the right of the opposite party to recover the amount from the complaint if any amount is paid in excess according to law.

           

          Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-

LADY MEMBER                                                                          PRESIDENT

// Certified free copy communicated under Rule 4 (10) of the A.P.S.C.D.R.C. Rules, 1987//

 

 

 

Copy to:-

Complainant and Opposite parties      :

Copy was made ready on                     :

Copy was dispatched on                      :

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.Y.Reddeppa Reddy, M.A., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.