Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/13/676

Sri.C.K.SATHISHAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY SUB DIVISION - Opp.Party(s)

RAJESH VIJAYENDRAN

04 Jan 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/676
 
1. Sri.C.K.SATHISHAN
[Con. No.TPR/9283/D], S/o. A M KUMARAN, PADINJARE ANJIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHUPATHIPARAMBU, PALLICHAKKALA ROAD, EROOR SOUTH, THRIPUNITHURA , PIN-682301
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY SUB DIVISION
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, EROOR SOUTH, THRIPUNITHURA, KOCHIN.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

ERNAKULAM.

Date of filing : 01/10/2013

Date of Order : 04/01/2014

Present :-

Shri. A. Rajesh, President.

Shri. Sheen Jose, Member.

Smt. V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

 

C.C. No. 676/2013

Between

     

    C.K. Sathisan,

    ::

    Complainant

    S/o. A.M. Kumaran,

    Padinjare Anjiparambil House,

    Puthupathiparambu,

    Pallichakkala Road, Eroor South,

    Thrippunithura – 681 301.

     

    (By Adv. Rajesh Vijayendran, M/s. Rajesh & Rathish Advocates, 35/191,

    Automobile Road,

    Palarivattom, Kochi – 25.)

     

    And

     

    Assistant Executive Engineer,

    ::

    Opposite Party

    Water Supply Sub-Division,

    Kerala Water Authority,

    Eroor South,

    Thripunithura, Kochin.

     

    (By Adv. P.A. Augustine, Standing Counsel for

    K.W.A., 91, D.D. Tex World, Market Road, Kochi – 11.)

     

    O R D E R

    A. Rajesh, President.

     

    1. The complainant availed a water connection of the opposite party. The complainant preferred this complaint challenging the disputed water charge arrear bill for Rs. 30,547/- dated 27-08-2013. The opposite party field a version stating that considering the reduced consumption of water by the complainant, they have revised the above bill amount to Rs. 9,265/-.

     

    2. During the proceedings in this Forum, the learned counsel for the complainant expressed the willingness of the complainant to remit the amount as per the revised bill provided the opposite party grants instalments for the same. Seemingly, the request of the complainant is genuine and reasonable. So, we are only to allow the same.

     

    3. Accordingly, we partly allow the complaint and direct as follows :-

    1. The complainant shall pay the amount of Rs. 9,265/- to the opposite party in 10 equal monthly instalments starting from 01-02-2014, failing which the opposite party is free to proceed legally. In that case, the order in I.A. No. 524/2013 will not stand in the way for the opposite party to proceed with legally.

    2. The order in I.A. No. 524/2013 dated 01-10-2013 would be in force till the above time limit.

       

    The order shall be complied with, in line with the above directions.

     

    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 4th day of January 2013.

     

     

    Sd/- A. Rajesh, President. Sd/- Sheen Jose, Member.

    Sd/- V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

     

    Forwarded/By Order,

     

     

     

    Senior Superintendent.

     

     

     
     
    [HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
    MEMBER
     
    [HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
    MEMBER

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.