Kerala

Idukki

CC/09/206

Prasannan S/O Damodaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

Assistant Engineer - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Babichan V. George

30 Jan 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. CC/09/206
1. Prasannan S/O DamodaranArayil veedu,KanjikuzhyIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. Assistant EngineerElectrical sub division,KSEB,VazhathopeIdukkiKerala2. Assistant Executive EngineerElectrical Major Section,KSEB, VazhathopeIdukkiKerala3. SecretaryKSEB,Vydyuthi bhavan, PattomThiruvananthapuramKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:

PRESENT :

Dated : 30 Jan 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DATE OF FILING : 22.10.2009


 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2010


 

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER


 

C.C No.206/2009

Between

Complainant : Prasannan S/o Damodaran,

Arayil House,

Punnayar Kara,

Kanjikuzhy Village,

Idukki District.

(By Adv: Babichen.V.George)

And

Opposite Parties : 1. The Assistant Engineer,

Kerala State Electricity Board,

Electrical Sub Division,

Vazhathoppu, Idukki District.

2.The Asst.Executive Engineer,

Kerala State Electricity Board,

Electrical Major Section,

Vazhathoppu, Idukki Distict.

3. The Secretary,

Kerala State Electricity Board, Vydhyudhi Bhavan,

Pattom P.O, Thiruvananthapuram.

(All by Adv: C.K.Babu)

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Complainant and opposite party absent. No representation. Counsel for the opposite party was heard on 29.01.2010. Opposite party's counsel submitted that the opposite party is ready for giving connection to the complainant's residence if the complainant produces the consent of the neighbouring property owner. The opposite party can apply for getting the consent through the District Collector only if the person applied for electric connection approaches and pays the special cash deposit. In this case the person applied for the electric connection is the pre-owner of the complainant's property. Hence the complainant is directed to obtain the consent of the neighbouring property owner or approach the opposite party with the applicant for paying special cash deposit. So the opposite party is directed to give electric connection to the complainant's residence within 15 days of the receipt of the consent of the neighbouring property owner. Otherwise if the applicant pays the special cash deposit, the opposite party is directed to apply for consent through District Collector within 30 days. Hence the petition dismissed.

 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 30th day of January, 2010
 

Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)
 

Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

 

 

Sd/-

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)