West Bengal

Birbhum

MA/24/2022

Amarendranath Saha - Complainant(s)

Versus

Assistant Engineer, W.B.S.E.D.C.L. , Office of Lohapur - Opp.Party(s)

31 Aug 2022

ORDER

JUDGEMENT
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,BIRBHUM
CHANDNIPARA, PO AND PS - SURI,
BIRBHUM, PIN - 731101,
WEST BENGAL
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/24/2022
( Date of Filing : 31 Aug 2022 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/78/2022
 
1. Amarendranath Saha
P.S Rampurhat, Dist. Birbhum
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Assistant Engineer, W.B.S.E.D.C.L. , Office of Lohapur
P.O Kasthagara, P.S Rampurhat Dist Birbhum
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 JUDGES SUKLA SENGUPTA PRESIDENT
  SASWATI SAHA MEMBER
  SUDIP MAJUMDER MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Smt. Sukla Sengupta . President.

Today is fixed for admission hearing. Complainant files hazira through his Ld. Advocate. Heard, perused the complaint and documents. It appears to us that prima facie a case has been made out against the Ops.

Let, the case be admitted. Requisites at once.

The complainant/petitioner files a petition U/S 38 of the C.P Act 2019 is being registered treated as  M.A Case No. 24/2022.

            Hence, along with a petition of complaint/petition alleging inter alia that the OP/WBSEDCL has sent excessive bill in respect of the electricity connection being ID No. 522024745 the last bill dated 02/08/2022. The OP claim Energy Charge 2988.00 and total charges Rs. 11109.99 which was excessive one and the complainant/petitioner is apprehending if the complainant would fail to pay the electric charge as claimed by the OP vide electric bill dated 02/08/2022 then the electricity connection of the complainant’s Consumer ID No. 522024745 will be disconnected by the OP/WBSEDCL.

            Hence, this application is filed with a prayer to restrain the OP from disconnecting electricity connection of the complainant Consumer ID No. 522024745.

            Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the balance of convenience and inconvenience of the same it appears that there is a prima facie case in favour of the petitioner .Hence, the OP/WBSEDCL is here by restrained from disconnection of the electricity connection of the complainant/petitioner on payment of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) immediately.

            Complainant/petitioner is directed to serve the notice upon the OP at once.

            Hence,

            Ordered,

                        That the prayer for restoration of the electricity connection in the premises in question of the complainant as prayed for in the application U/S 38 of the C.P Act 2019 is hereby considered and allowed exaprete.

Thus the M.A. Case No. 24/2022 is disposed of.

Fix. 03/11/2022 for S/R, appearance and W/V from/by the OP side.

           Copy of this order be supplied to the parties each at free of cost.

 
 
[JUDGES SUKLA SENGUPTA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SASWATI SAHA]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SUDIP MAJUMDER]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.