Kerala

Trissur

CC/08/349

P.A.Muhammed - Complainant(s)

Versus

Assistant Engineer, KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.A.D.Benny

31 Dec 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAyyanthole , Thrissur
CONSUMER CASE NO. 08 of 349
1. P.A.MuhammedProprietor,City Restaurant,KodungallurThrissurKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Assistant Engineer, KSEBElectrical Section.No:2,KSEB,KodungallurThrissurKerala2. Kerala State Electricity BoardRep by Secretary,TVMThiruvananthapuramKerala ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Adv.A.D.Benny, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 31 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

 
By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President
           The complainant is a consumer of respondents vide consumer No.11232. He is running the business for the purpose of earning his livelihood by means of self employment. The respondents issued Exhibit P1 notice demanding to pay Rs.4,460/- as additional security deposit. The notice is illegal. It is stated that if the amount is not paid they will disconnect the electricity. There is no details of accounts. The act of the respondents in issuing Exhibit P1 notice is deficiency in service on the part of them. Hence the complaint.
 
           2. The respondents are called absent and set exparte. 
 
            3. The complainant filed affidavit and Exhibit P1 notice to substantiate his case. According to him he is not liable to remit the amount because it does not contain detailed accounts.
 
            4. We have perused Exhibit P1 notice and it is issued to pay additional security deposit. It is issued as per the Supply Code and Indian Electricity Act. As per the Code the consumer is liable to pay such an amount as additional security deposit. The statutory period is also there as per Exhibit P1. So the complainant is liable to pay the amount.
 
            5. In the result the complaint is dismissed with direction to remit the amount by 2 equal monthly instalments consecutively. The first instalment shall pay within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
 

             Dictated to the Confdl. Asst., transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 31st day of December 2009. 


HONORABLE Rajani P.S., MemberHONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh, PRESIDENTHONORABLE Sasidharan M.S, Member