Andhra Pradesh

Prakasam

CC 14/2010

P.RAMA TULESAMMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER - Opp.Party(s)

P.V.S.R.K.MURTHY

17 Jun 2010

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC 14/2010
 
1. P.RAMA TULESAMMA
W/O LAKSHMAIAH,HINDU,SOPIRALA VILLAGE,CHINAGANJAM MANDAL,PRAKASAM DISTRICT
 
BEFORE: 
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 The case of the complainant is that the opposite parties booked false case alleging theft of energy without verifying all the  connections in the house to harass the complainant and disconnected the supply and sent a letter assessing electricity charges as Rs.1,29,939/- and demanded to pay Rs.64,920/- for restoration of supply. It is the further case of the complainant that the opposite parties issued another notice to pay Rs.11,000/- for compounding the offence and the  complainant paid both the amounts and got the supply restored. It is the further case of the complainant that the previous demand notices and receipts filed by her clearly reveal that there was no pilferage/theft of energy and the opposite parties filed false case against her and the opposite parties are liable to refund the amount collected from her.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.