Vishnu Kant Jha. filed a consumer case on 12 Dec 2015 against Assistance Controller, Rajendra Krishi Univeristy, in the Muzaffarpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/90/2009 and the judgment uploaded on 07 Jun 2017.
District Consumer Forum, Muzaffarpur
Complain Case No. – 90/2009
Vishnu Kant Jha, S/o Late-Harigovind Jha aged-67 years, R/o Vill- Berua Dih, Post-Bariyarpur, P.S- Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur. Present Address- Purani Bajar, Shukla Road, Satynarayan Mandir Lan Muzaffarpur-842001………………………………………………………………...Complainant
V/S
Assistance Controller, Rajendra Krishi Univeristy, Bihar Pusa, Seed, Processing Plant T.C.A , Dholi-843121……………………. Opposite Parties.
Date of order- 12-12-2015
Present.
President,
Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur
Member
Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur
for complainant Sri Ranjeet Kumar – representative
for Opposite Party- Sri Tarkeshwar Sati Pd. And Akhileshwar Kumar- Advocate
Order
The complainant has filed his case of claim for Rs.94,440 on 06-08-2009 arises from unprocessed seed of Til purchase from the opposite party for cultivation in his land invested Rs. 11,240/- and damaged of crop Rs. 83,200/-
The case of complainant appears from his complaint petition supported with an affidavit alleged there in that he has purchased 8 Kg. of til seed on 27-01-2009 for Rs. 600/- for cultivation in his 4 Bigha of land from the opposite party, accordingly he prepared his filed and cultivated the seed but the seed was not germinated, only 1 or 2 % seed was germinated as such he inform the opposite party on 01-03-2009 and requested to get examine germination of his seed but the opposite party had not taken care he waited him and seed became destroyed, the opposite party had not given any direction to him as such he suffered loss of Rs. 94440/- including Rs. 11,240/- for cultivation and Rs. 83,200/- for average production and accordingly he has filed his case with aforesaid claim.
The complainant has filed Xerox copy of Cash memo for purpose of til B/S 8 Kg. for Rs. 600/- on 27-01-2008. Gate pass receipt dated 27-01-2009 lebel and letter dated 18-03-2009 send by him for enquiry by the opposite party.
He has also filed rejoinder dated 30-07-2010 against the written statement dated 08-04-2010 filed by the opposite party.
In this case opposite party appeared and has filed his written statement on 08-04-2010 supported with an affidavit alleged therein that the case is not maintainable and he has no valid cause to file this case and is not entitle for any relief from the opposite party. He has admitted the purchase of til seed and at the time of purchase the opposite party has directed him that the said seed should be cultivated from 25 February to 10 March which is mentioned in University publicated diary but the complainant has cultivated before date that is 29-01-2009 as such seed was not germinated. He has also admitted the information given by the complainant dated 18-03-2009 the opposite party has further alleged that before time of prescribed germination if the seed was not germinated it is not upon the opposite party. He is not liable for any discrepancy. The opposite party has further alleged that the complainant has informed him on 18-03-2009 and requested for examination within 10 days which come up to 28-03-2009 but as per allegations of complainant he has again the plough his field within 15 and 20 days which was from 01-03-2009 as such it appears that within 15-03-2009 to 20-03-2009 he get ploughed his land and after 2 to 3 days of his plough of filed he cultivated and another crop in the said field as such there is no any scope for inspection of germination of seed. The seed was properly processed under watch of scientific officers. Further the opposite party has alleged that the complainant has given the price of produced crop @ of 8000 but as per the market rate there is rate to til is Rs. 2000/- to 3000/- per quintal as such the case is total concocted and not maintainable against the opposite party and prayed to dismiss the case.
After going through the rejoinder of written statement the complainant has mentioned that due to typing mistake date has been motioned in his complaint petition as 01-03-2009 at the place of 18-03-2009.
Considering the facts, circumstances, material available with the record as well as allegations of the respective parties admittedly the complainant has cultivated his til crop on 29-01-2009 which is against the prescribed time of cultivation published by the opposite party, that the time of cultivation of seed of til is from 25 February to 10 March, as such admittedly the complainant has cultivated the said seed about 1 month prior from the prescribed cultivation time as such the complainant is admittedly at fault. Regarding the information given by the complainant for non germination of seed that he has informed on 18-03-2009. It has no meaning to give any explanation regarding the date of mentioning in his complaint petition of information mistakenly typed as 01-03-2009 it has no meaning for adjudication when the complainant is found at fault that he has cultivated his crop one month prior to the prescribed time, he cannot get any relief. Because he has not given any explanation that how and what circumstances he was incompetence to crop the said seed. It is on him, as such after careful consideration and scrutiny we are of the opinion that the complainant is at fault and is not entitle to for any relief and his case is not maintainable.
Accordingly the case and the same is dismissed with cost.
Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.