Karnataka

StateCommission

A/2023/2023

AKSHAY ENVIRONCE PRIVATE LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSHWARYA SAMSKRUTHI OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION - Opp.Party(s)

G.VEERENDRA BABU

06 Jun 2024

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/2023/2023
( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/10/2023 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/88/2023 of District Bangalore 2nd Additional)
 
1. AKSHAY ENVIRONCE PRIVATE LIMITED
NO.495, AISSHWARYA ICON, LEVEL-4, CMH ROAD, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE 560038 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.G.SATHISH BABU
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ASSHWARYA SAMSKRUTHI OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
BURAGUNTE VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE 562125 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT PRESIDENT MR.AVINASH PRASAD
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Dtd.06.06.2024                                            A/2023/2023

O R D E R

            BY Mr.K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : Pri.Dist & Session Judge (R) - JUDICIAL MEMBER.

 

  1.    This is an appeal filed U/s.41 of CPA 2019 by OP/Appellant aggrieved by the order dtd.12.10.2023 passed in CC/88/2023 on the file of 2nd Addl., District Commission, Bengaluru urban. (Parties to the appeal henceforth are referred to their rank assigned to them by the District Commission).

 

  1. The Commission examined grounds of appeal, impugned order, appeal papers and heard the learned counsels.

 

  1. In a pending complaint filed by the Complainant/Respondent against OP/Appellant, an application came to be filed at the instance of Complainant U/o 6 Rule 17 of CPC “to add Aishwarya Samskruthi Owners Welfare Association represented by its Secretary as Complainant and to delete Aishwarya Samskruthi Owners Welfare Association represented by its President” which is strongly objected by OP by filing objections to the said IA. On the ground amendment proposed under IA is not permissible under law, since President has no authority to file the present complaint and now by adding as proposed is represented by its Secretary, would change the entire nature of the complaint was not considered by the District Commission. Learned counsel for Appellant would submit amendment sought for is to cure fundamental defect which could not be allowed. In our view facts remain as per bye laws of the Complainant, the Secretary alone is to sue or to be sued was rightly considered by the District Commission, while passing the impugned order, since by addition or deletion as proposed in the IA, would not cause any prejudice to OP and it would not change the nature of the complaint. In such view of the matter Commission proceed to dismiss the appeal with no order as to cost.

 

  1. Notify copy of this Order to the District Commission and parties.

 

 

   Lady Member                                Judicial Member               

 

*NS*     

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.