West Bengal

Howrah

CC/14/299

KAMAL KANTA DAS - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSDA AGRO PROJECT LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

13 Jan 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/299
 
1. KAMAL KANTA DAS
S/O lt. Sital Chandra Das, Malia Para, P.o. bighati P.S. Bhaddeswar
Hooghly 712124
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ASSDA AGRO PROJECT LIMITED
Head office 69, BT Road, Panihati P.s. Kardah
Kolkata 700 114
2. Assda Agro Project Limited., Branch Office
301, G.T. Road, 1st floor, Belur Bazar, Near Belur Girls School,
Howrah 711 202
3. Assda Agro Project Limited., Managing Director Viz Aloke Das,
S/O Abani Mohan Das, 476, Nandan Nagar, Belgharia
North 24 Parganas 700 083
4. SRI DEBASISH DUTTA
S/O Gouranga Dutta, Executive Director of Assda Agro Project Limited., 13, Adarsha Pally, Belgharia
North 24 Parganas 700 056
5. NABARUN DUTTA
S/O Monilal Dutta, Administrative Director, Assda Agro Project Limited., 7, teachers Colony Agarpara,
Kolkata 700 056
6. SHEIKH AJGER ALI
S/O Sheke Jakir Hossain, Director Assda Agro Project Limited., Md. Kala Chand Road, P.O. Ghola Bazar,
North 24 Parganas Kolkata 700 111
7. SK MANSUR ALI
S/O Sheke Jumman Ali, Director, Assda Agro Project Limited., Iswaripur Suryapur, Khardah,
North 24, Parganas Kolkata 700 121
8. SHEKE JASMIR HOSSAIN
S/O Akbor Hossain, Chairman, Assda Agro Project Limited., Iswaripur Nilganj Road, P.O. Suryapur
North 24, Parganas Kolkata 743120
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     23-05-2014.

DATE OF S/R                            :      01-08-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER       :     13-01-2015.  

 

Kamal Kanta Das,

son of late Sital  Chandra Das,

residing at Malia Para, P.O. Bighati, P.S. Bhaddeswar,

District Hooghly,

PIN 712124……….. ……………………………………………COMPLAINANT.

 

-          Versus   -

 

1.         ASSDA Agro Project Limited,

having its registered and head office

69, B.T. Road, Panihati, P.S. Kardah, Kolkata 711114.

having its branch office at 301, G.T. Road, 1st Floor,

Belur Bazar, near Belur Girls School,

District Howrah,

PIN 711202, being represented by its

Managing Direcot viz. Aloke Das,

son of Abani Mohan Das,

residing at 476, Nandan Nagar, Belgharia,

District North 24 Parganas,

PIN 7000 83.   

 

2.         Sri Debasish Dutta,

            son of  Gouranga Dutta,

            as the Executive Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at 13, Adarsha Pally, Belgharia,

            District Nor 24 Parganas,

            PIN 7000 56.

 

3.         Nabarun Dutta,

            son of Monilal Dutta,

            as the Administrative Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at 7, Teachers Colony Agarpara,

            Kolkata 700056.

 

4.         Sheikh Ajger Ali,

            son of  Sheke Jakir Hossain,

            as the Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at Md. Kala Chand Road, P.O.  Ghola Bazar,

            North 24 Parganas, Kolkata 700 111.

 

5.         Sk. Mansur Ali,

            son of  Sheke Jumman Ali,

as Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            Residing at Iswaripur, Suryapur, Khardah, North 24 Parganas,

            Kolkata 700 121. 

 

6.         Sheke Jasmir Hossain,

            son of Akbor Hossain,

            as the Chairman of Assda  Agro Project Limited,

            residing at Iswaripur, Nilganj Road, P.O. Suryapur,

            North 24 Parganas, Kolkata 7743120. ……………………OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

                                                P   R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

 

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

1.Complainant   by filing a petition U/S 12 of the C .P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) has prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.p. to refund entire deposited amounts of  monthly interest scheme,  to pay Rs. 40,000/- as compensation in total and Rs. 10,000/- as litigation costs along  with other relief or reliefs as the  Forum may deem fit and proper. 

 

2.Brief fact of the case is that complainant made  investments  in monthly interest scheme of o.ps.  The o.ps.  issued certificates  vide Annexures  in favour of the complainants which  are  as follows :

M.I.S. Certificate Nos. 126151, 126189, 119685, 126178, 119566, 107075, 116207, 125534, 117249, 121765.

 

 

3.O.P.    promised to pay the monthly interest on the due dates to the complainant and upto August, 2013 they paid the same regularly. Thereafter they stopped to make any payment towards monthly interest and maturity amount of the recurring deposits. Complainants  repeatedly went to the office of o.ps. but on different  pleas they have returned the complainants  without giving their  monthly interest amount as well as the maturity amount. It is further stated by the complainants that due to this non action and gross negligence on the part of the o.ps., complainants have  been compelled to face tremendous problem due to scarcity of money with which they were  supposed to meet  their  day to day expenditure, medical expenditure, children’s education etc. which are really at stake. So, finding no other alternative, complainants  filed this instant  petition praying for the aforesaid relief. 

 

4.Notices  were served upon o.ps.  They neither appeared nor filed any written

version. Accordingly the case was heard ex parte against the o.ps. 

 

5.Two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is   entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

6.Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. We have carefully gone through the complaint petition along with annexures filed by the complainant and noted its contents. Admittedly complainant invested a large amount  in the o.ps. company. It is a fact that o.ps. have failed to pay the monthly interest since September,  2013  for which complainants felt tremendous monetary problem. Because, people invest their hard earned money in a reputed company to get the ultimate benefit at their need. O.ps. have miserably failed to keep its  promise which they made on the face of the certificates issued by them in favour of   complainants. For their gross negligence in discharging duties, complainants had to  suffer a lot for the crying need of money. Sacrificing many present enjoyments involving monetary expenditure, complainants made those investments foreseeing their future needs. If that criteria is not fulfilled due to o.ps.’  severe negligence, complainant is, thereby, truly prejudiced which can be very well understood by a man of common prudence. Moreover, the o.ps. have not cared to appear before the Forum even after receiving summons.  No W/V has been filed by o.p. nos. 1 to 6  which clearly shows that they have nothing to put forward in their favour. And the complaint petition remains unchallenged and uncontroverted against o.p. nos. 1 to 6. And we have no difficulty to believe the unchallenged testimony of the complainant.  O.ps. have miserably failed   to keep promise which certainly amounts to deficiency in  service coupled with unfair trade practice  on their  part which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.   And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainant  should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.

 

      Hence,

 

                                    O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

 

      That the C. C. Case No. 299  of 2014 ( HDF 299  of 2014 )  be  allowed ex parte  with  costs  against  the O.Ps. 

 

      That the  O.Ps.  are jointly and severally    directed   to pay the principal amount  along with upto date monthly due interest  in terms of the certificates in question  within one month from this order  i.d., at the rate of 9 per cent p.a. interest shall be charged on the entire decreetal amount till actual payment.

      No order as to compensation.

      The complainant do get an award of Rs. 2,000/- as litigation cost and o.ps. are directed to pay the same within one month from this order i.d. amount shall carry an interest at the rate of 9 per cent  p.a. till actual payment

      The complainant is  at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

            Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.      

 

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME. 

 

                                                                   

      (  Jhumki Saha  )                                                                  

  Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.