West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/364

SRI SANTANU MUKHERJEE - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASSAD AGRO PROJECT LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

08 Jan 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/364
 
1. SRI SANTANU MUKHERJEE
S/O- Late Shyamapada Mukherjee, Basai, Kanaipur, Hoogly-712 234.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ASSAD AGRO PROJECT LIMITED
69, B.T. Road, PanihatI, P.S-Khardha, Kolkata-700 114
2. Sri Debasish Dutta
S/O Gouranga Dutta, Executive Director of Assda Agro Project Limited, 13, Adarsha Pally, Belgharia,
North 24 Parganas – 700056
3. Nabarun Dutta
S/O Monilal Dutta, Administrative Director, of Assda Agro Project Limited, 7, Teachers Colony Agarpara Kolkata
Kolkata – 700 056
4. Sheikh Ajger Ali
S/O Sheke Jakir Hossain, Director of Assda Agro Project Limited, Md. Kala chand Road, P.O. Ghola Bazar, North 24 Parganas, Kolkata
Kolkata – 700 111
5. SK. Mansur Ali
S/O Sheke Jumman Ali, Director of Assda Agro Project Limited, Iswaripur, Suryapur, Khardah, North 24 Parganas, Kolkata
Kolkata – 700 121
6. Sheke Jasmir Hossain
S/O Akbor Hossain, Chairman of Assda Agro Project Limited, Iswaripur, Nilganj Road, North 24 Parganas, Kolkata
Kolkata – 700 120
7. Baghajatin Biswah
S/O Lt. Adhir Kumar Biswas, 3 no. N.S. Road, Sasthitala, Telini para, Bhadreswar
Hooghly
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     09-10-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      13-02-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER       :      08-01-2015.  

 

1.Sri Santanu Mukherjee,

son of late Shyamapada Mukhrjee,

for self and the constituted attorney of the

complainant nos. 2 to 11.

 

2.Smt. Kajori Mukherjee,

wife of Sri Santanu Mukherjee,

both are residing at Basai, Kanaipur,

District Hooghly,

PIN 712234.

 

3.Sri Kamalesh Adhikary,

Son of late Samir Adhikari,

Residing at 45, Shantipally, Bhaddeswar,

District Hooghly.

 

4.Sri Sudip Datta,

son of Sri Dilip Datta,

residing at 7/2, Bamacharan Mukherjee Lane, Rishra,

District Hooghly.

 

5.Smt. Samita Ghosh,

wife of late  Surajit Ghosh,

residing at ¾, Sadhan Kanan, Rishra,

Hooghly.

 

6.Smt. Sandipta  Ghosh,

daughter of  Samita Ghosh,

residing at 4, Sadhan Kanan,  Rishra,

Hooghly.

 

7.Sri  Swapan Kumar Das,

son of  late Panchugopal Das,

residing at 18, Deoanjee Street, P.O.  Rishra,

District Hooghly.

 

8.Smt.  Rinki Das nee  Chatterjee,

daughter of Swapan Das, residing at 18, Deoanjee Street, P.O. Rishra,

District Hooghly.

 

9.Sri Samiran  Chakraborty,

son of late Satyabrata Chakraborty,

residing at 208, Sukanta Pally, Rail Park, Rishra,

Hooghly. 

 

10.Smt. Anita Mondal,

wife of late Dilip Mondal,

 residing at 56, N.S.  Road, Rishra,

District Hooghly.

 

11.Sri  Agradip Achayarya,

son of Smt. Rita Achayarya, residing at 22, Panchanantala 3rd Bye Lane,

Rishra, District Hooghly…................................................................COMPLAINANTS.

 

-          Versus   -

 

 

 

1.         ASSDA Agro Project Limited,

having its registered and head office

69, B.T. Road, Panihati, P.S. Kardah, Kolkata 711114.

having its branch office at 301, G.T. Road, 1st Floor,

Belur Bazar, near Belur Girls School,

District Howrah,

PIN 711202, being represented by its

Managing Direcot viz. Aloke Das,

son of Abani Mohan Das,

residing at 476, Nandan Nagar, Belgharia,

District North 24 Parganas,

PIN 7000 83.   

 

2.         Sri Debasish Dutta,

            son of  Gouranga Dutta,

            as the Executive Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at 13, Adarsha Pally, Belgharia,

            District Nor 24 Parganas,

            PIN 7000 56.

 

3.         Nabarun Dutta,

            son of Monilal Dutta,

            as the Administrative Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at 7, Teachers Colony Agarpara,

            Kolkata 700056.

 

4.         Sheikh Ajger Ali,

            son of  Sheke Jakir Hossain,

            as the Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            residing at Md. Kala Chand Road, P.O.  Ghola Bazar,

            North 24 Parganas, Kolkata 700 111.

 

5.         Sk. Mansur Ali,

            son of  Sheke Jumman Ali,

as Director of Assda Agro Project Limited,

            Residing at Iswaripur, Suryapur, Khardah, North 24 Parganas,

            Kolkata 700 121. 

 

6.         Sheke Jasmir Hossain,

            son of Akbor Hossain,

            as the Chairman of Assda  Agro Project Limited,

            residing at Iswaripur, Nilganj Road, P.O. Suryapur,

            North 24 Parganas, Kolkata 7743120.

 

7.         Baghajatin Biswas, 

            son of late Adhir Kumar Biswas,

residing at 3 no. N.S.  Road, Sasthitala, Telini Para,

Bhaddeswar,  District Hooghly…………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

                                                P   R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

 

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

1.Complainants eleven  in numbers   by filing a petition U/S 12 of the C .P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) has prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.p. to refund deposited amounts of  fixed deposit, maturity amounts of monthly interest as well as   monthly recurring deposits,  to pay Rs. 1,15,500/- as compensation in total and Rs. 22,000/- as litigation costs along  with other relief or reliefs as the  Forum may deem fit and proper. 

 

2.Brief fact of the case is that complainants made  investments  in the scheme of Fixed deposit scheme, monthly interest scheme and  recurring deposits of o.ps.  The o.ps.  issued certificates  vide Annexures  in favour of the complainants which  are  as follows :

 

1.Monthly Recurring Certificate nos. R-2/00364, R-2/00448, R-2/00449, R-2/00450, R-2/00279,  M.I.S. Certificate nos. 119175, 119253, 119291, 123738, 119226., 119593, 119778,

2.M.I.S. Certificate nos. 123736, Fixed Deposit Certificate no. 123722,

3.M.I.S. Certificate no. 119777,

4.Monthly Recurring Certificate nos, R-2/00412, Fixed Deposit Certificate no. 125824, 

5.Monthly Recurring Certificate no, R-2/00040, Fixed Deposit Certificate nos. 125825, 124059,

6.Monthly Recurring Certificate no, R-2/00029, Fixed Deposit Certificate no. 117224,

7.Monthly Recurring Certificate no, R-2/00413,

8.Monthly Recurring Certificate no. R-2/00089,

9.Monthly Recurring Certificate no, R-2/00368,

10.Monthly Recurring Certificate no. R-2/00039,

11.Monthly Recurring Certificate no. R-2/00143,

 

 

3.O.P.    promised to pay the monthly interest on the due dates to the complainants and upto November, 2013 they paid the same regularly. Thereafter they stopped to make any payment towards monthly interest. Complainants  repeatedly went to the office of o.ps. but on different  pleas they have returned the complainants  without giving their  monthly interest amount as well as the maturity amount. It is further stated by the complainants that due to this non action and gross negligence on the part of the o.ps., complainants have  been compelled to face tremendous problem due to scarcity of money with which they were  supposed to meet  their  day to day expenditure, medical expenditure, children’s education etc. which are really at stake. So, finding no other alternative, complainants  filed this instant  petition praying for the aforesaid relief. 

 

4.Notices  were served.  O.p. nos. 5, 6 & 7    appeared  but only o.p. no. 7  filed    written version and the other o.ps. remained absent. Accordingly, case was heard ex parte against o.p. nos. 1 to 6.

 

5.Two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainants  are   entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

6.Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. We have carefully gone through the complaint petition along with annexures filed by the complainant and noted its contents. We have also read the W/V filed by o.p. no. 7. Admittedly complainants invested a large amount  in the o.ps. company. It is a fact that o.ps. have failed to pay the monthly interest since December, 2013 for which complainants felt tremendous monetary problem. Because, people invest their hard earned money in a reputed company to get the ultimate benefit at their need. O.ps. have miserably failed to keep its  promise which they made on the face of the certificates issued by them in favour of   complainants. For their gross negligence in discharging duties, complainants had to  suffer a lot for the crying need of money. Sacrificing many present enjoyments involving monetary expenditure, complainants made those investments foreseeing their future needs. If that criteria is not fulfilled due to o.ps.’  severe negligence, complainants are, thereby, truly prejudiced which can be very well understood by a man of common prudence. Moreover, the o.ps. have not cared to appear before the Forum even after receiving summons  except o.p. no. 7.  No W/V has been filed by o.p. nos. 1 to 6  which clearly shows that they have nothing to put forward in their favour. And the complaint petition remains unchallenged and uncontroverted against o.p. nos. 1 to 6. And we have no difficulty to believe the unchallenged testimony of the complainants.  O.ps. have miserably failed   to keep promise which certainly amounts to deficiency in  service coupled with unfair trade practice  on their  part which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.   And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainants  should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.

 

      Hence,

 

                                    O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

 

      That the C. C. Case No. 364  of 2013 ( HDF  364  of 2013 )  be  allowed ex parte  with  costs  against  the O.P.  nos. 1 to 6 and allowed on contest  with costs against o.p. no. 7.    

 

      That the  O.Ps.  are jointly and severally    directed   to pay the principal amount  as well as maturity amount of all investments of the complainants  along with upto date monthly due interest  in terms of the certificates in question  within one month from this order  i.d., at the rate of 9 per cent p.a. interest shall be charged on the entire decreetal amount till actual payment.

      No order as to compensation.

      The complainants do get an award of Rs. 10,000/- as litigation cost and o.ps. are directed to pay the same within one month from this order i.d. amount shall carry an interest at the rate of 9 per cent  p.a. till actual payment

      The complainants are  at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

            Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.      

 

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME. 

 

                                                                   

      (  Jhumki Saha  )                                                                  

  Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.