Ashwini Finance Service & 2 others V/S V.T. Mohan - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

EA/40/2006

V.T. Mohan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ashwini Finance Service & 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

07 Jun 2007

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
Execution Application(EA) No. EA/40/2006

V.T. Mohan						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Ashwini Finance Service & 2 others						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

D.Hr. and the J.Dr. counsels have filed two separate memos also signed by the respective parties. D.Hr. in his memo reports the receipt of entire amount due in this execution and undertaken to get the criminal case No.PCR 792/06 dismissed which has been filed on the basis of cheque bearing No.972160, and to dismiss the execution petition as fully satisfied. In the memo filed by the J.Dr. he has undertaken that he will not misuse the on demand promote note and a cheque issued to him against the D.Hr. in any way in future. With this the counsel for both the parties submitted for closing the execution petition. In view of the above memos filed by both the parties, D.Hr. is directed to withdraw the criminal case filed against the J.Dr. under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and J.Dr. shall also not to mis-use the on demand promote note that are in his custody, executed by the D.Hr. with this execution petition is closed as fully satisfied.

D.Hr. and the J.Dr. counsels have filed two separate memos also signed by the respective parties.<br /> D.Hr. in his memo reports the receipt of entire amount due in this execution and undertaken to get the criminal case No.PCR 792/06 dismissed which has been filed on the basis of cheque bearing No.972160, and to dismiss the execution petition as fully satisfied.<br /> In the memo filed by the J.Dr. he has undertaken that he will not misuse the on demand promote note and a cheque issued to him against the D.Hr. in any way in future. With this the counsel for both the parties submitted for closing the execution petition.<br /> In view of the above memos filed by both the parties, D.Hr. is directed to withdraw the criminal case filed against the J.Dr. under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and J.Dr. shall also not to mis-use the on demand promote note that are in his custody, executed by the D.Hr. with this execution petition is closed as fully satisfied.