Respondent/ Complainant purchased a Honda Unicorn Bike from the Petitioner’s dealer on 21.5.2006.  While on his way to his residence, the handle of the bike started bubbling.  The Respondent approached the dealer on 22.5.2006  who, in turn, asked him to approach Petitioner/OP No. 1.  Complainant approached Respondent No. 1 for removal of the defects but in vain.  The vehicle was taken three times to the workshop but the same could not be repaired.  He sent a notice to all the Petitioners seeking replacement of the vehicle to which no heed was paid.

        Aggrieved by this, the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum. 

The District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the Petitioners/OPs to either replace  the  Bike  with  a new one  or  refund the cost of Rs. 57,218/- alongwith compensation of Rs. 15,000/- and Rs. 3,000/- as  cost. 

Petitioner not satisfied with Forum’s order, filed appeal before the State Commission which has been dismissed by the Impugned order.  The State Commission has come to a concurrent finding of fact that the vehicle started giving trouble from day one and the Petitioner’s dealer has failed to rectify the same in spite of repeated visits to them.   Finding recorded by the fora below is a finding of fact which cannot be interfered with in revisional jurisdiction.  This Commission in revisional  jurisdiction can interfere only if there is an error in exercise of the jurisdiction.  In the present case, we do not find any jurisdictional error in the orders passed by the fora below.  Dismissed.