Kerala

Malappuram

CC/225/2022

UMESH R - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASHRAF TRAVEL VISION HOLIDAYS - Opp.Party(s)

05 Dec 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/225/2022
( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 2022 )
 
1. UMESH R
NANDHU NIVAS SCHOOLPARAMB UMMATHUR PAZHAMALOOR 676506
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ASHRAF TRAVEL VISION HOLIDAYS
1ST FLOOR TAJ BUILDING CENTRE BAZAR POOKATIRI 676552
2. ASHRAF TRAVEL VISION HOLIDAYS
DD MILE STONE ROOM NUMBER 101 SECOND FLOOR KADAVANTHRA JUNCTION KOCHIN ERNAKULAM 682020
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

By Smt. PREETHI SIVARAMAN.C, MEMBER

1.Case of the complainant:-

        Complainant   and    his wife decided to  join the tour programme  Conducted  byopposite parties from 20/05/2022 to 28/05/2022. The opposite parties had promised to take it to the places like Delhi, Kulu Manali, Amritsar, Agra  and also offered three star accommodation, food and semi sleeper bus.  Including train charge,   opposite parties wanted Rs. 21,900/- per person and complainant had paid Rs.35,000/- in advance on 21/04/2022 through google pay to  opposite party's account. The opposite parties had demanded a total of Rs.61,000/- for the complainant and his wife. After complainant and his wife reached Delhi on 20/05/2022, the services offered by the opposite parties were not fully provided and due to poor quality of food, the complainant and his wife and other passengers suffered from dysentery and constipation.

2.     When complainant and his wife reached at Nedumbasseri Airport on 20/05/2022, the opposing parties told the complainant and his wife  that after deducting the advance amount, the remaining amount of Rs.26,000/- should be paid to the tour manager in cash. On 20/05/2022 as per the instructions of the opposite parties, the complainant gave Rs.26, 000/- in cash pay to the tour Manager Jubair at Delhi. Complainant again said that opposite parties   did not provide the facilities offered by them during   the journey of complainant and his wife. Moreover opposite parties did not show  the complainants  any of the places  which they  had earlier offered. The complainant again stated that   the journey, food and stay were full of misery.

3.    Complainant and his wife and other co-passengers were suffered a lot mentally and physically. The hotels and other places provided for stay were very substandard quality and were not fit to stay with family. Star facility or other promised facilities were not given by opposite parties to complainant. The bus and other vehicle for travelling were also in a local level.  Moreover all the passengers were suffered due to stomach ache and dysentery etc.  The opposite parties did not provide the facilities as promised earlier to the complainant.
4.     Due to the deficiency in service from the side of opposite parties, on 12/05/2022 some passengers were put the stories of difficulties they suffered  in the travel  and in the food into the whatsaapp group formed by opposite parties. Thereafter opposite parties did not respond even for a phone call from complainant and his co- passengers. Complainant and his wife had suffered diarrhoea and vomiting during the travel from Delhi to their home town on 27/05/2022. On 29/05/2022, complainant had approached Taluk Hospital, Malappuram due to emergent health problems. Thereafter  condition of complainant and his wife had worsened.
5.  Due to the deficiency in service  and unfair trade practice from the side of opposite parties,  complainant and other forty persons in the tour group who are highly qualified and  high profile persons  suffered  a lot mentally and physically.  The substandard quality of food, accommodation and travel facilities caused mental agony and hardship to complainant and his wife and other co-passengers. Half of the places promised to  be shown  to the complainant  in the tour brochure were not shown to the complainants.  There is clear deficiency of service and unfair practice from the side of opposite parties.  Hence this complaint. 
6.     The prayer of the complainant is that , he is entitled to get the refund  Rs. 61,000/- and Rs. 4,00,000/-as compensation for the  mental agony and hardship from 
suffered by the complainant due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice 
the side of opposite parties .
7.      On admission of the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties and notice served on them and they did not turn up. Hence opposite parties set exparte.

8.      In order to substantiate the case of the complainant, he filed an affidavit in lieu of Chief examination and the documents he produced were marked as Ext. A1 to A11. Ext.A1 is the copy details regarding the payment of Rs.35,000/- through Google pay transaction done by complainant to opposite party dated 21/04/2022 , Ext. A2 is the copy of   receipt  for  payment of Rs. 26,000/- dated 20/05/2022, Ext. A3 is the copy which shows the number of passengers on that tour, Ext. A4 is the copy of brochure published by opposite parties, Ext. A5 is the copy of  Tour ID cards of complainant and his  wife and  details of ticket reservation at KSRTC, Ext.A6 is the copy of  flight ticket  of complainant and his wife at Indigo flight, Ext. A7 is the copy of electronic reservation slip , Ext. A8 is the copy of  prescription of Sajida from  Civil Hospital, Padhar dated 24/05/2022, Ext. A9 is the copy of  the bill from Shagundhaba, Ext. A10 is the copy of prescription  given to complainant from Government Taluk Hospital dated 29/05/2022, Ext. A11 Copy of Pharmacy bill given from Orchid ,Hospital Malappuram.

9.    The allegations against opposite parties are proved by the unchallenged evidence of complainant. There is no contra evidence in this matter.   Moreover complainant produced eleven documents which are very supportive to prove his case. It is true that opposite parties have not been able to implement fully the promises offered by them. But they took the complainant and his wife on the tour programme conducted by them from 20/05/2022 to 28/05/2022. So the first prayer of the complainant for refund of the amount is not justifiable.   The Commission finds that there is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties as alleged in the complaint. Hence we allow this complaint holding that opposite parties are deficient in service.

10. We allow this complaint as follows:-

  1. The opposite parties are directed to pay compensation of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) to the complainant on account of deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties and thereby caused mental agony, physical hardships and sufferings to the complainant.
  2. The opposite parties are also directed to pay Rs.2,000/(Rupees Two thousand only) as cost of the proceedings.

          If the above said amount is not paid to the complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the opposite parties are liable to pay the interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the said amount from the date of receipt of the copy of this order till realisation.

Dated this 5th day of December, 2022.

 

MOHANDASAN K., PRESIDENT

 

PREETHI SIVARAMAN C., MEMBER

 

MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V., MEMBER

CPR

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX

Witness examined on the side of the complainant                         : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the complainant                       : Ext.A1to A11

Ext.A1 : Copy details regarding the payment of Rs.35,000/- through Google pay transaction done by complainant to opposite party dated 21/04/2022 .

Ext. A2 : Copy of   receipt  for  payment of Rs. 26,000/- dated 20/05/2022.

Ext. A3 : Copy which shows the number of passengers on that tour.

Ext.A4 : Copy of brochure published by opposite parties.

Ext.A5 : Copy of  Tour ID cards of complainant and his  wife and  details of ticket   

                reservation at KSRTC.

Ext.A6 : Copy of  flight ticket  of complainant and his wife   at Indigo flight.

Ext.A7 : Copy of electronic reservation slip.

Ext.A8 : Copy of  prescription of Sajida from  Civil Hospital, Padhar dated 24/05/2022. Ext.A9 : Copy of  the bill from Shagundhaba.

Ext.A10 : Copy of prescription  given to complainant from Government Taluk Hospital

                 dated 29/05/2022.

Ext. A11 : Copy of Pharmacy bill given from Orchid ,hospital Malappuram.

Witness examined on the side of the opposite party                         : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the opposite party                       : Nil

 

 

MOHANDASAN K., PRESIDENT

 

PREETHI SIVARAMAN C., MEMBER

 

MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V., MEMBER

CPR

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.