Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/18/2008

Sk. Safiulla, aged 24 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd., Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri N.N Praharaj & Others

19 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/18/2008
( Date of Filing : 12 Feb 2008 )
 
1. Sk. Safiulla, aged 24 years
S/o. Sk. Abdul, At- Aradbazar, P.S- Town, P.O/ Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd., Balasore
At- Vivekananda Marg, Chidiapolo, P.S- Town, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. Branch Manager, IndusInd Bank, Balasore Branch
At- F.M Golei, P.S- Town, P.O/ Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for re-hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. The Ops are also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of both the parties. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, Ops are appeared and filed their respective written versions. As it appears from the case record, the case was heard on merit on 25.02.2014 and posted for order. In the meantime, the President was on the verge of transfer and new President was joined on 28.02.2017. So, the case was lingering for hearing of the case afresh. Accordingly, notice to both parties were issued on 29.07.2017 intimating for hearing of the matter afresh. But, the complainant did not turn up and slept over the matter since 26.09.2017 and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to proceed with the case further, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.                           

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.