SHAKILUR RAHMAN filed a consumer case on 21 Oct 2016 against ASHOK BRAND in the East Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/521/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Mar 2017.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, EAST, Govt of NCT Delhi
CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, 1st FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI 110092
Consumer complaint no. 521 / 2015
Date of Institution 16/07/2015
Order Reserved on 21/10/2016
Date of Order 24/10/2016
In matter of
Mr Shakilur Rehman, adult
R/o J 3/43 J, Extn.
Kishan kunj, Laxmi Nagar
Delhi 110092.……………….……..…………….Complainant
Vs
1-Ashok Kumar Bnsal
& Rahul Bansal
F 144D, Main Market,
Laxmi Nagar, Delhi 110092……………………...……………………… Opponents
Complainant……………………………………In Person
Opponent ……....……………………………..Ex Parte
Quorum Sh Sukhdev Singh President
Dr P N Tiwari Member
Mrs Harpreet Kaur Member
Order by Dr P N Tiwari Member
Brief Facts of the case
Complainant purchased a yellow color suit from OP shop on 11/07/2015 at night at about 9.30pm for a sum of Rs 2500/ vide cash memo no. 7204. On the next day in the daylight, complainant saw that the color of the said suit was different then what he saw in the night, so he went to OP shop and told about the colour of his suit as dirty and an old one. So, he demanded his money back after some deduction, but OP did not replied satisfactory and even on repeated call from his own mobile, no response was given. When complainant did not get any reply, filed this complaint claiming the refund of his suit cost Rs 2500/- with harassment Rs 5000/.
Notice was served but none appeared from OP nor submitted written statement5. Even on next dates of hearing, none appeared from OP, so case proceeded Ex Parte. Later, Op filed his written statement but due to expiry of statutory limitation to file written statement, written version was not taken on record. No evidences on affidavit were filed by Complainant. Complainant put his appearance on the date of arguments but, did not submitted evidences on record, despite giving ample opportunity to complete the proceedings.
File was perused and order was reserved. It was seen that complainant had purchased on yellow color suit from OP at late evening at 9.30pm. By seeing the cash memo, the actual price was written to Rs 2800/- but OP had given concession of Rs 300/- and net Rs 2500/- was paid by complainant. The cash memo contains terms and condition also. The terms and condition no. 2 states that “NO guarantee for color and embroidery work besides any refund after alteration would be done.”
Complainant had not filed any concrete evidence to show that the color was different then he purchased at night and it was dirty.
Thus, we are of the opinion that the complainant has failed to prove OP unfair trade practice and deficiency in service where the color of suit was different or had gone faded. It is quite obvious that light colour clothes purchased at late evening at 9.30 pm, would appear in different colour, the OP had given concession of Rs 300/- in his bill.
Hence, there are no merit in the complainant and deserve to be dismissed, so dismissed without cost.
The copy of this order be sent to the parties as per rules and file be consigned to the Record Room.
Mrs Harpreet Kaur (Dr) P N Tiwari
Member Member
Shri Sukhdev Singh
President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.