Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/26/2010

Rakesh kUmar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ashok Bhardwaj Advocate Punjab and Haryana HIgh Court Office cum residence 520, Halla Majra - Opp.Party(s)

12 Mar 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 26 of 2010
1. Rakesh kUmarson of Jagan Nath R/o House No. B-III/453 Jandanwala Road Barnala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Ashok Bhardwaj Advocate Punjab and Haryana HIgh Court Office cum residence 520, Halla MajraPunjab and Haryana High Court Office-cum-Resident 520 Hallo majra UT Cahndigarh second office at P & H High Court New Bar Room No-11 ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 12 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Criminal Complaint No. 26 of 2010

                                                            in

Complaint Case No.1017 of 2009

Rakesh Kumar          –          Complainant

 

                        Versus

 

Ashok Bhardwaj       –          Opposite Party (OP)

 

Present:          None for the parties.

                       

                                                           

                                                            ORDER

 

                   In view of the stay order dated 4.2.2010 passed by the Hon’ble State Commission in FA No.34 of 2010, the present execution would not sustain. The execution application is accordingly dismissed as unsatisfied. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application as and when the FA No.34 of 2010 is decided.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

12.03.10     (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)        (MADHU BEHL)                       (JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL)

                                    MEMBER                       MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT

 


NONE RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBER