NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/539/2017

M/S. APOLLO HOSPITALS ENTERPRISES LTD. & 2 ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ASHOK BALLIWAR - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. K. MARUTHI RAO & K. RADHA

10 Oct 2017

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 539 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 21/12/2016 in Complaint No. 469/2015 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. M/S. APOLLO HOSPITALS ENTERPRISES LTD. & 2 ORS.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REG. OFFICE : 19, BISHOP GARDENS, RAJA ANNAMALAIPURAM,
CHENNAI-600028
2. M/S. APOLLO HOSPITAL, PR NO. 3-5-836 TO 838,
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEAR OLD MLA QUARTERS, HYDERGUDA,
HYDERABAD-500029
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. ASHOK BALLIWAR
S/O. SANGHAIAH, R/O. JUKKAL POST AND MANSAL, NIZAMABAD,
NIZAMABAD DISTRICT,
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DR. B.C. GUPTA,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mrs. Radha, Advocate
For the Respondent :

Dated : 10 Oct 2017
ORDER

DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

1.       The OP/Apollo Hospital filed this revision petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 21.12.2016 passed by Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad in I.A. No. 158 of 2015 in CCSR No. 469 of 2015 whereby the State Commission allowed the application for condonation of delay of 210 days, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid to the Bar Association by the complainant and condoned the delay. 

2.       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.  She submitted that the complainant filed a complaint of alleged medical negligence after a delay of 210 days alongwith I.A. No. 158/2015.  The State Commission allowed the I.A. and sympathetically condoned the delay of 210 days in filing the complaint and the matter was posted for filing the written version of the OP.  Even on the merits, there was no deficiency on the part of the OP. 

3.       We have perused the material on record and gave our thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced by the petitioner.  In the instant case, the complainant took initial treatment from OP/hospital during 17.07.2012 to 27.10.2012 and thereafter suffered MRSA-the hospital infection.  Therefore, the complainant alleged that it was due to medical negligence of the hospital. The doctors at Apollo Health City Campus/OP 3 diagnosed the problem of complainant as “SEPTIC SHOCK ? MRSA OSTEOMYEILTIS OF SCALP” and treated him from 18.4.2013 and discharged on 1.5.2013.  The instant complaint was filed before the State Commission on 31.3.2015.  Therefore in our considered view, the cause of action was aroused on 1.5.2013 i.e. on the date of discharge.  Thus, the complaint was filed within the limitation period of two years as per Section 24-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

4.       On the basis of discussion above, the first appeal is hereby dismissed.  The parties to appear before the State Commission for further proceedings on 14.11.2017.   

 
......................
DR. B.C. GUPTA
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.