Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2011/445

N I M T-B School - Complainant(s)

Versus

Aruna - Opp.Party(s)

Vaibhav Raj

13 Jun 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2011/445
( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2011 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)
 
1. N I M T-B School
a
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Aruna
a
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Oral

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P. Lucknow.

Appeal No. 445 of 2011

1- NIMT-B School, G.T. Road, Delhi Ghaziabad

    High Way, Near Bridge Hindan River, Mohan

    Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. through its Chairman

    K.P. Singh.

2- K.P. Singh, Chairman, NIMT-B School, G.T. Road,

     Delhi - Ghaziabad High Way, Near Bridge Hindan

     River, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.

3- Assistant Registrar, NIMT-B School, G.T. Road,

    Delhi - Ghaziabad High Way, Near Bridge Hindan

     River, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.

4- Smt. Madhu Chopra, Assistant Registrar, NIMT-B

    School, G.T. Road, Delhi-Ghaziabad High Way,

    Near Bridge Hindan River, Mohan Nagar,

    Ghaziabad, U.P.                                             …Appellants.

Versus

Aruna d/o Sri Rudra Narain Mishra,

R/o Quarter No.2425, Sector-6D,

Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro (Jharkhand).         .…Respondent.

Present:-

1- Hon’ble Sri Sushil Kumar, Presiding Member.

2- Hon’ble Smt. Sudha Upadhyay, Member.

None for the appellants.

Sri S.K. Verma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.

Date  13.6.2024

JUDGMENT

Per Sri Sushil Kumar,  Member-   This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 19.2.2011 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Ghaziabad in complaint case no.223 of 2009 whereby the ld. District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay Rs.1,31,050.00 along with  interest @6% p.a., Rs.1,00,000.00 towards compensation and Rs.5,000.00 as cost of the case to the complainant.

 

          None appeared for the appellant. ld. counsel for the respondent Sri S.K. Verma is present.

We have heard the ld. counsel for the respondent and perused the judgment and order which reveals the appellant institution was not recognized under AICTE, therefore, was not entitled to get the admission and receive the fees from the candidates. Hence, judgment and order passed by the ld. District Consumer Commission needs no interference. The    appeal deserves to be dismissed.

ORDER

          Appeal is dismissed.

If, any amount, is deposited by the appellants at the time of filing of this appeal under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, may be remitted to the ld. District Consumer Forum concerned for satisfying the decreed, as per rules alongwith accrued interest upto date.

The stenographer is requested to upload this order on the Website of this Commission today itself. 

          Certified copy of this judgment be provided to the parties as per rules.        

  

        (Sudha Upadhyay)                       (Sushil Kumar)                             

                Member                              Presiding Member

Jafri, PA I

Court 2

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUSHIL KUMAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SUDHA UPADHYAY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.