Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/63/2019

R. Ravi, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Arumugam, - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

30 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.63 / 2019

(Against the order in C.C. No.18/2018, dated:13.02.2019 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

                         DATED THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       R. Ravi,

S/o. Mr. Ramasamy,

No.15, Lala Chathiram Street,

Kundrathur,

Chennai – 600 069.                                                                                                                           .. Appellant / Complainant.

-Versus-

Mr. Arumugam,

A. Raja Cement Jolly Works,

No.9/99, Kundrathur Main Road,

Khovur,

Chennai – 600 128.                                                                                                                                        .. Respondent / Opposite party.

 

 Appellant/ Complainant                                    : Party in person  

Respondent / Opposite party                            : Party in person

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.11.2021 for appearance of both, for written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket order

No representation for both in person. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both if any and for arguments (in list).  When the matter was called at 11.55 A.M., the Appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.50 P.M. then also, the Appellant has not appeared.  Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.