Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/58/2008

K.Venkatachalam Pillai and Sons - Complainant(s)

Versus

Arul Murugan - Opp.Party(s)

S.Logaganesan

30 Jan 2015

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/58/2008
 
1. K.Venkatachalam Pillai and Sons
Vedha systems,west brindhavanam,Pondicherry
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

CC  No.58/2008

 

Dated this the 30th day of January 2015.

 

K.Venkatachalam Pillai & Sons

Vedha Systems, West Brindavan

Puducherry

Rep. by its Proprietor Sundar.                                            .. Complainant.

 

                                                                                                            Vs

M.Arul Murugan, Managing Partner

M/s.Hi Tech Builders,

No.7, Perumal Kovil Street,

Karaikal.                                                                                .. Opposite party.

 

 

BEFORE:

 

            THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

            PRESIDENT 

 

 

Tmt. PVR. DHANALAKSHMI, B.A.,B.L.,

           MEMBER

 

                                   

FOR THE COMPLAINANT         :  Thiru.S.LogaGanesan, Advocate.

 

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY    : Thiru.K.Veerapandian, Advocate.

 

 

 

ORDER

 

This is a complaint praying to direct the opposite party to construct the balance portion of the complainant's house as per the terms and contract entered between them and on his failure directing him to pay a compensation to the complainant a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest and cost and to pass necessary orders in the interest of justice.

2.         Summons served to the opposite party.  The opposite party appeared through his counsel and filed reply version. An Engineer from Public Works Department, Karaikal was appointed to inspect the site and to file report.  After inspection, the Engineer filed his report and the same was marked as Ex.X1 when he was examined as court witness before this court.

 

 

3.         Today the complaint was called.  Complainant absent and his counsel absent, no representation made.  The opposite party absent, counsel represented.  No interest shown  by the complainant to proceed the matter.  Hence this complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

Dated this the 30th  day of January 2015.

 

 

 

  1. ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(PVR. DHANALAKSHMI)

MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.