West Bengal

StateCommission

A/868/2019

Dr. Anuradha Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Area Service Manager, M/s. TTK Prestige Ltd. & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sibojyoti Chakraborty

06 Nov 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/868/2019
( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/09/2019 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/279/2018 of District Kolkata-I(North))
 
1. Dr. Anuradha Das
D/o Lt. Dr. Dharma Brata Das, 23C, Dr. Ashutosh Shastri Road, P.S.- Beliaghata, Kolkata - 700 010.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Area Service Manager, M/s. TTK Prestige Ltd. & Others
12, Chowringhee Square, P.S. - Bowbazar, Kolkata - 700 069.
2. The Manager, Customer Care, M/s. TTK Prestige Ltd.
11th Floor, Brigade Towers, Brigade Road, Bangalore - 560 025.
3. The Manager, Customer Care, M/s. Big Bazar Future Retail Ltd.
Sealdah Commercial Complex, 1, Beliaghata Main Road, Kolkata - 700 014.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr. Sibojyoti Chakraborty, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Santanu Sen., Advocate for the Respondent 1
 R. Biswas. Koyel Senapati., Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 06 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Sri Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

Both sides are present through their respective Ld. Counsels.

Today is fixed for final hearing of the appeal.

The appeal is taken up for hearing.

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 25.09.2019 passed by the Ld. DCDRC, Kolkata Unit—I (North), dismissing the Complaint Case being no. 279/2018, the Appellant/Complainant preferred this appeal.

Heard the submission of the Ld. Counsels for both sides and perused the impugned judgment along with the record.

The Ld. Commission below came to the conclusion that the technician concerned made proper service in respect of the four head Hob top burner. It transpired from the Ld. Advocates for both sides that the OP took the burner for the purpose of repair. It was replaced by a two head burner. It is further submitted by the Appellant that she is not satisfied with the said two head burner as it has some defects.

In the complaint made in the District level, the Appellant/Complainant prayed for refund of the consideration money along with cost and compensation.

The fact remains that the two head burner is now in possession of the Appellant.

We are of considered view that necessary direction need be given to the Respondent/OP to hand over a new four head burner of same standard at their own initiation and the Appellant should return the two head burner which is already in her possession, on receipt of the same.

Hence, it is,

O R D E R E D

That the appeal being no. 868/2019 be and same is allowed on contest. The Respondent is directed to replace the four head Hobtop burner by a new one of same standard at their own initiation and the Appellant is also directed to return the two head burner on receipt of the same. The Respondent is directed to pay Rs. 500/-(Rupees Five Hundred) only to the Appellant towards litigation. This order is to be complied within a period of 14 days from this order.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the parties free of cost.

Appeal being no. 868/2019 is disposed of.

Note accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.