West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/19/2021

Pinki Kumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Area Manager of Sahara India - Opp.Party(s)

Munmun Das

15 Feb 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/2021
( Date of Filing : 14 Jan 2021 )
 
1. Pinki Kumari
12/1C,N Roy Road, P.S. Tiljala,Kolkata-700039.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Area Manager of Sahara India
2A,Shakespeare Sarani,P.S. Shakespeare Sarani,Kolkata-700071.
2. Raja Bazar Sector Manager
28A,Raja Dinendra Street,1st Floor,P.S. Narkeldanga,Kolkata-700009.
3. Manager,Sealdah Branch
1st Floor,38,Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, Baithakkhana,P.S.Amherst Street,Kolkata-700009.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Munmun Das, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 15 Feb 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 02 Date.  15.02.2021

 

            Today is fixed for admission hearing.

 Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.

 Heard the Ld. Advocate for the complainant. Perused the consumer complaint coupled with its annexure thereto. U/s 34 (2) of C.P. Act, 2019 a complaint shall be instituted in a District Commission within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, -

  1. the opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, ordinarily resides or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works for gain; or
  2. any of the opposite parties where there are more than one, at the time of the intuition of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business or has a branch office, or personally works for gain, provided that in such case the permission of the District Commission is given; or
  3. the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises; or
  4. the complainant resides or personally works for gain.

On perusal of the cause title of the consumer complaint, it appears to us that OPs 2 & 3 are carrying on business outside the territorial jurisdiction of this commission and OP 1 is the Area Manager of Sahara India Ltd. and it is the Area Office of Sahara India Ltd. not branch office. Moreover, the complainant fails to produce any document to establish that she is an inhabitant of 12/1, C. N. Roy Road, P.S.- Tiljala Kolkata- 700039. Certificate of Sahara Q Shop was issued by service centre of Raja Bazar sector.

In view of the above aspect, we are not inclined to admit the complaint is liable to be dismissed in limini.

Hence,

 

                                                   ORDERED

            That the consumer complaint is not admitted and dismissed in limini.

            Complainant may agitate her grievance to the competent D.C.D.R.C.

            In view of non admission consumer complaint Miscellaneous Application is not tenable and rejected.

            Thus, Miscellaneous Application being No. 22/2021 is disposed of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.