Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/224/2018

Syndicate Bank, Rep by its Manager, Armenian Street, Chennai-600 001 - Complainant(s)

Versus

Aravind K. Valiyathara, Rep by its Power Agent, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. P. Sreenivasulu

28 Feb 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.224/2018

(Against the Order dt.06.07.2017 made in C.C. No.32/2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

                         DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 

Syndicate Bank,

Chennai Main Branch,

Represented by its Manager,

No.69, Armenian Street,

Chennai – 600 001.                                                           .. Appellant / Opposite party.

-Versus-

Aravind K. Valiyathara,

Represented by its Power Agent,

Ms. Madhavi Menon,

D/o. Late. P. Madhava Menon,

D-54, Syndicate Residency,

No.36, Dr. Thomas Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.                                                      .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / Opposite party     : M/s. P. Sreenivasulu

Counsel for the Respondent / Complainant   : M/s. Deepa Harigovind

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.02.2022 for appearance of appellant, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for appellant.  Respondent present.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and  called again at 01.15 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT