Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/266/2022

Syam P Raj - Complainant(s)

Versus

Arav Fashions - Opp.Party(s)

13 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/266/2022
( Date of Filing : 01 Jul 2022 )
 
1. Syam P Raj
Ernakulam
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Arav Fashions
mumbai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 266/2022 Filed on 01/07/2022

ORDER DATED: 13/10/2022

 

Complainant

:

Syam.P.Raj, Mamkuzhi Veedu,  Maradu.P.O., Ernakulam – 692 304.

Temporary Adderss: Muslim Service Society, Jella Committee and Medical Guidance Centre, TC.2/5&4(2), Rajeev Ganthi Nagar, Medical College.P.O., Thiruvananthapruam – 11.    

                   (Party in person)

Opposite party

:

Aravi Fashions, 96 Yogichwok, Peledium Square, Sarthana Jakat naka, Surat, Gujarat – 395 006.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party.  The said notice was returned with endorsement ‘no such addressee’.  Hence the complainant was directed to take steps against the opposite party.  When the case came up for consideration today the complainant was present and submitted that the fresh address of the opposite party is not available and hence he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The complainant made an endorsement on the complaint to that effect.  In the above circumstances this complaint is to be dismissed as not pressed. 

            In the result the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 13th day of October,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.