Maharashtra

Pune

E-77/2010

Ahuja P.G. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Aqua Engineering Sys. - Opp.Party(s)

25 Jun 2014

ORDER

PUNE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
PUNE
Shri V. P. Utpat, PRESIDENT
Shri M. N. Patankar, MEMBER
Smt. K. B. Kulkarni, MEMBER
 
Execution Application No. E-77/2010
In
 
1. Ahuja P.G.
Gokhale Road Pune
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. MOHAN PATANKAR MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

Per Hon’ble Shri. V.P. Utpat, President

 

                                     JUDGMENT

                                Dated 25thJune 2014

 

[1]            This Execution Application is filed by the complainant u/s 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Complainant has obtained Order in CC/09/21 on 18/2/2010 against Opponent and as per the said Order Opponent was directed to complete water proofing work of the complainant as per the letter dated 17/3/2008 and was also directed to pay compensation and cost of Rs.1500/-.

[2]            After filing execution proceeding Opponent appeared and filed photographs and report of the expert - Shri. Jayant Khode, who had visited the site and prepared the report. He had also produced five photographs and on the basis of these photographs he had opined that the Opponent has completed the work as regards colouring, crack filling, seepage, dampness etc. The evidence of expert which is produced on behalf of Opponent is showing that the Opponent has substantially complied with the order of the Forum. Now, the Complainant has contended that the warranty of five years for the said work is not given by the Opponent. Hence, the Order is not still complied. According to the Opponent, complainant had got done some of the work through another contractor and the warranty is exhausted. This fact is not seriously disputed by the complainant. In this circumstances, this Forum is of the opinion that the Order of the Forum is substantially complied, compensation and cost amount is already paid to the complainant and there is no sufficient evidence to continue the proceeding against Opponent u/s 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Hence, following order is passed-

                                        :- ORDER :-

  1. The proceeding of Execution Application No.77/2010 is closed.
  2. No order as to costs.
  3. Copy of order be supplied to both the parties free of cost.
  4. Both parties are directed to collect the sets which are provided for the Hon’ble Members.

 Copy of order be supplied to both the parties free of cost.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHAN PATANKAR]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.