NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/178/2010

THYMOOTIL GEORGE - Complainant(s)

Versus

APPOLLO HOSPITAL ENTERPRIZES - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

09 Sep 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 12/04/2010 in Complaint No. 02/2006 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)
1. THYMOOTIL GEORGEKalika Nagar,Raipur Road, TifraBilaspurChhattisgarh2. SMT.SELIN GEORGEKalika Nagar, Raipur Road, TifraBilaspurChhattisgarh ...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. APPOLLO HOSPITAL ENTERPRIZESThrough Chief Executive Officer, Vill.Lingiadih, Seepat Road,BilaspurChhattisgarh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. SURESH CHANDRA ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 09 Sep 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

It is seen that there are a number of defects, which are required to be removed from the memo of appeal filed by the appellant for which a notice was issued for today on 29.6.2010. Despite notice, none appears. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting his appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and removal of defects.



......................SURESH CHANDRAPRESIDING MEMBER