Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/133/2021

Ramkumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Apple india - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

       SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN       : PRESIDENT

    SMT.PREETHA G NAIR   : MEMBER

                                   SRI.VIJU.V.R                    : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.133/2021 (Filed on : 20/03/2021)

ORDER DATED : 31/10/2022

COMPLAINANT

Ram kumar,

Kumar vilasom,

Dam.P.O, Thenmala,

Kollam, Kerala – 691308

 

(By Adv.Arya.S.Nath)

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. Apple India Private Limited,
19.  

Vittalmallya Road, Bangalore – 560001

•  

2. F1 Info Solutions & Services Pvt Ltd,

Apple Authorized Service Provider,

TC 11/637/11, Museum-Nanthancode Road,

Museum Bains Compound Road,

Below Helmet World, Thiruvananthapuram

Kerala – 695003

3. Appario Retail Pvt Ltd, Renaissance Industrial Smart City,

Kalyan Sape Road, Vashere village, Amane Post,

Bhiwandi Taluka, Thane District Thane,

Maharashtra – 421 302

4. Amazon India, Brigade Gate Way, 8^th Floor, 26/1,

Dr.Rajkumar Road, Malleshwaram(W), Bangalore – 560044,

•  

(OP1 by Adv.Suja Madhav)

(OP4 by Adv.Narayan.R)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties nos. 1 & 4 entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. As the second opposite party not appeared before this commission after accepting the notice, second opposite party was called absent and set exparte. The notice issued to third opposite party was returned unserved. Hence the complainant was directed to take steps against third opposite party. As the complainant was continuously absent and not taken any steps against third opposite party, this commission issued notice to the complainant to appear before this commission today to further proceed with this complaint. When the case came up for consideration, it is noticed that the notice issued to the complainant was served. Even after accepting the notice, the complainant failed to appear before this commission to further proceed with this complaint. Hence we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

                    In the result, complaint is dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs.  

          A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 31^st day October 2022.

                                                                              Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                       Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                           Sd/-

VIJU.V.R    : MEMBER

                                                                                              

Be/