Telangana

StateCommission

CC/140/2014

Mr.Vissapragada Vekatarao Son of Sri Vissapragada Perraju - Complainant(s)

Versus

Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. C.V. Narasimham

02 Mar 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Complaint Case No. CC/140/2014
 
1. Mr.Vissapragada Vekatarao Son of Sri Vissapragada Perraju
Aged 73 Years, R.o.House No.5.27, Deepthisri Nagar, Miyapur Post, Hyderabad 500 049
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Regional Office Aditya JR Towers, 8.2.120 by 86 by 9, A and B, 3rd Floor, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 034 Rep. by its Managing Director
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 02 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

CC. No. 140 of 2014

 

Between

Mr. Vissapragada Venkatarao,

S/o Sri Vissapragada Perraju,

Aged 73 years, R/o House No.5-27,

Deepthisri Nagar, Miyapur (post),

Hyderabad – 500 049.

 

... Complainant

And

 

Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Regional Office: Aditya JR Towers, 8-2-120/86/9,

A & B, 3rd Floor, Road No.2,

Banjara Hills, Hyderabad – 500 034,

Rep. by its Managing Director.

...Opposite Party

 

Counsel for  the Complainant                 :         Sri C.V. Narasimham

Counsel for the Respondent                   :         Sri K. Visweswara Rao

 

 

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N. Rao Nalla              ....President

&

Sri Patil Vithal Rao         ... Member

 

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH, 2017

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice B.N. Rao Nalla, President)

 

@ @ @

 

 

          This is a complaint filed by the Complainant  under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986  praying to allow the complaint and declare that the Opposite Party has committed deficiency of service and unfair trade practice in repudiating the claim of the complainant; direct the Opposite Party to settle the claim of the complainant; to pay  Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation for causing mental agony and also pay Rs.50,000/- towards costs, in the interest of justice.

 

 

          Counsel on both sides present. Counsel for Complainant filed a memo stating that the matter has been settled amicably by and between the parties.  In the circumstances, memo is recorded in terms of the memo therein and the complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                            PRESIDENT                               MEMBER

 

 

​CC. No.140 of 2014 Dt 02-03-2017

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.