Dhrup Singh filed a consumer case on 03 Nov 2022 against Apollo Munich Health Insruance co. Ltd. in the Bokaro Consumer Court. The case no is CC/2/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Nov 2022.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bokaro
Date of Filing-05-01-2019
Date of final hearing-03-11-2022
Date of Order-03-11-2022
Case No. 2/2019
Dhrup Singh S/o Late Ganesh Singh,
R/o Shivpuri Colony, Near Balidih Thana,
P.O. & P.S. Balidih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand
Vs.
1. Apollo Munich Health Insruance co. Ltd.
Central Processin Centre, 2nd & 3rd Floor, ILABS centre,
Plot NO. 404, 405, Udoy Bihar, Phase-III,
Gurgaon-122016, Haryana
2. Branch Manager, Canara Bank,
Main Branch, Western Avenye, Naya More,
Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand
Present:-
Shri Jai Prakash Narayan Pandey, President
Shri Bhawani Prasad Lal Das, Member
Smt. Baby Kumari, Member
PER- J.P.N Pandey, President
-Judgement-
2. Complainant’s case in short is that he obtained Easy Health Group Insurance Policy No. A007631 from O.P. No.1 Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd. and paid Rs. 13,198.30 as premium and policy was valid from 26.08.2017 to 25.08.2018. Further case is that during that very period complainant met with an accident and was admitted at Bokaro General Hospital on 24.11.2017 and discharged on 25.11.2017 after treatment during which he paid Rs. 9,557/- as medical expense to the Hospital concerned but inspite of submission of claim his medical expense was not paid by O.Ps. hence legal notice was served having no impact thereafter, this case has been filed.
3.W.S. has been filed by O.P. No.1 (Insurance Co.) mentioning therein that inspite of demand for submission of the papers complainant has not provided it, hence vide letter dt. 02.08.2018 his claim has been repudiated with observation that company can re-open the claim & decide on admissibility. But till now those required documents have not been provided to the company, therefore, there is no question of nonpayment of the amount. Further reply is that case is pre-matured because no documents have been provided to the insurance co. within prescribed period of 30 days hence there is no cause of action for the case. Further reply is that it is true that the complainant has obtained alleged insurance policy for the alleged period. Further it is reply that since no cause of action has arised hence case is liable to be dismissed.
O.P. No.2 (Bank) has filed reply mentioning therein that Bank is having no liability to pay the mediclaim.
From perusal of the papers submitted by both the parties it appears that the complainant has obtained insurance policy from O.P. No. 1. As per insurance Co. some papers were wanting hence for want of fulfillment of legal criteria claim has been repudiated with liberty to the complainant to provide required documents on which O.P. will re-consider the claim .
In the given facts we are of the opinion that this case is liable to be disposed off with certain observations in the following manner:-
Accordingly this case is being disposed off.
(J.P.N. Pandey)
President
(B.P.L Das)
Sr. Member
(Baby Kumari)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.