View 10603 Cases Against Hospital
View 96 Cases Against Apollo Hospital
Arithrik Basak, S/o Sri Gopal Basak, Residing at Padmapur, Dharmanagar, P.O P.S Dharmanagar District North Tripura State Tripura 799 250 And Another filed a consumer case on 22 Feb 2022 against Apollo Hospital Enteerprises Ltd, BISHOP Gardens Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai 600 028.Rep by its Chai in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is CC/116/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 13 May 2022.
BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI MEMBER
C.C. No.116/2019
DATED THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
Arithrik Basak,
S/o. Sri Gopal Ch. Basak,
Resident of:
Padmapur, Dharamanagar,
P.O & P.S – Dharamanagar,
District – North Tripura,
State: Tripura,
PIN – 799 250.
A Minor represented by his Father & Natural Guardian:
Sri Gopal Ch. Basak,
S/o. Late Narayan Ch. Basak,
Resident of:
Padmapur, Dharamanagar,
P.O & P.S – Dharamanagar,
District – North Tripura,
State: Tripura,
PIN – 799 250. .. Complainant.
-Versus-
1. M/s. Apollo Hospital Enterprise Ltd.,
Represented through its Chairman,
Bishop Gardens Raja Annamalaipuram,
Chennai – 600 028.
2. M/s. Apollo Children’s Hospital,
Represented through its Chairman,
No.15, Shafee Mohammed Road,
Thousand Lights,
Chennai – 600 006.
3. M/s. Apollo Gleneagles Hospital Kolkata,
Represented through its CEO,
No.58, Canal Circular Road,
Kolkata – 700 054,
West Bengal.
4. M/s. Apollo Gleneagles Hospital,
(Information Centre),
Represented through its Manager,
IGM Hospital Lane,
Rabindra Pally Road,
Agartala – 799 001. .. Opposite Parties.
Counsel for the Complainant : M/s. Achari & Antoni Associates
Counsel for the Opposite party Nos.1 & 2 : M/s. Maimoona Badsha
Counsel for the Opposite party Nos.3 & 4 : Mr. Dayaleeswaran
This consumer complaint coming up before us on 22.02.2022 for filing proof affidavit of complainant finally as last chance or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:
Docket order
Opposite party Nos.1 & 4 present. No representation for the complainant.
Today, this matter is posted for filing proof affidavit of complainant finally (as last chance) or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for complainant. Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.15 P.M. still, there is no representation for the complainant and no proof affidavit was also filed on his behalf.
We are of the view that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.
Sd/- Sd/-
S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI R.SUBBIAH
MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.