Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

CC/124/2011

Surisetty Ramalinga Jagga Apparao - Complainant(s)

Versus

APEPDCL - Opp.Party(s)

P.S.R.C Patnaik

13 Feb 2015

ORDER

                                              Date of Registration of the Complaint:26-04-2011

                                                                                                Date of Order:13-02-2015

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II AT

                             VISAKHAPATNAM

 

P  r  e  s  e  n  t:

1.  Sri H. Ananda Rao, M.A., L.L.B.,

     President

2. Smt K. Saroja, M.A. B.L.,

     Lady Member 

                                3. Sri C.V. Rao, M.A., B.L.,

                                     Male Member

           Friday, the13^th day of February, 2015.

                                   CONSUMER CASE No.124/ 2011

Between:-

Surisetty Ramalinga Jagga Appa Rao,

S/o Bhoolakanaidu, Hindu, aged 33 years,

Business, R/o D. No. 19-1-37/A, Villuri

Joginaidugari Veedhi, Gavarapalem,

Anakapalle Post& Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

                                                                             …. Complainant   

 And:-                                                                                  

1.The Asst. Engineer, A.P.E.P.D.C.L,

   Operation (D1), Anakapalle,

   Visakhapatnam District.

2.The Asst. Divisional Engineer,

   A.P.E.P.D.C.L, Operation, Anakaplle

   Post and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

3.The Chief General Manager, (Operation),

   A.P.E.P.D.C.L, Corporate Office, P & T colony,

   Seethammadara, Visakhapatnam.

4.The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle,

   A.P.E.P.D.C.L., Opp: Green Park Hotel,

   Visakhapatnam.

5.The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation,

   A.P.E.P.D.C.L, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.

                                                                               … Opposite Parties

 

This case coming on 13.02.2015 for dismissal before us in the presence of Sri P.S.R.C. Patnaik & Sri S. Nanajee, Advocates for the Complainant and Sri A.Venu Gopal Rao, Advocate for the Opposite Parties 1 to 5 and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                ORDER

         (As per Sri H. Ananda Rao Honourable President on behalf of the Bench)

 

          Complainant is called absent.   No representation inspite of specific directions.   Perused previous docket orders.   Hence, Complaint is dismissed for default without costs.

   Sd/-                                                Sd/-                                Sd/-

Male Member                           Lady Member                         President