Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/54/2009

Sh. Baljit Singh Mann - Complainant(s)

Versus

APC Corporte Office ( India) - Opp.Party(s)

18 Dec 2009

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 54 of 2009
1. Sh. Baljit Singh MannR/o House No. 51 Sector-2, Panchkula Haryana ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 18 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Execution Application No. 54 of 2009

                        in

                                    Complaint Case No. 887 of 2008

Baljit Singh Mann  –  Complainant.

                        Versus

 

1.         APC Corporate Office (India), Bangalore – OP No.1.

2.         M/s Suntrek C, Chandigarh (deleted vide order dated 14.7.09) – OP No.2.

3.         Rolex Logistic Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh – OP No.3.

 

Present:          None for Complainant.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The certificate issued to District Collector, U.T. Chandigarh u/s 25(3) of the C.P.Act for recovery as arrears of land revenue had been received back as the defaulter was not available on the given address. At the request of counsel for complainant, fresh certificate u/s 25(3) was issued to District Collector U.T. Chandigarh at the 2nd address given by complainant. However, no report has been received back.

                        Today in the morning, proxy counsel for complainant appeared and he was asked from where the complainant gathered the 2nd address of OP No.1 and to furnish the correct address of OPs, on which he stated that regular counsel for complainant would appear afternoon session for making his submissions. It is already 3.30 P.M. Case called many times. None is present for complainant. Further wait is not justified. The application is accordingly dismissed for default of appearance. However, the complainant may file afresh application as and when the correct address of OPs comes to his knowledge, as permitted by law.

                        The certificate issued to the Collector concerned under Section 25(3) of the C.P.Act is hereby cancelled and be called back.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

18.12.2009   (MADHU BEHL)       (SIDDHESHWAR SHARMA)        (JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL)

                          MEMBER                                 MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT

 


MR. SIDDHESHWAR SHARMA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBER