Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/237/2015

R. Yogeswaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

AP. Senthilkumar - Opp.Party(s)

K. Murugan

16 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE       Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                    Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.237/2015

(Against the order in C.C. No.43/2012, dated:04.06.2015 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Namakkal)

                         DATED THE 16^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

R.Yogeswaran,

Raj Cable,

24-E, Omsakthi Illam,

Ashok Nagar, Mohanur Road,

Namakkal – 637 002.                                            ..Appellant/1^st Opposite party

-Vs-

1.A.P.Senthil Kumar S/o. Arumugam,

   1/2D, Ponnarsankar Nagar, Periapatti Road,

   Sandaipettai Puthur,

   Namakkal-637 002.

 

2.Tamilnadu Payaneetaalar Sangam

   Rep. by its President Secretary

   Ka.Subbarayan                                               ..Respondent / Complainant

 

3.M.Madheswari,

   Assistant Manager, (Cable TV),

   Tamilnadu Govt. Cable TV Corpn. Ltd.,

   12.D.2, Karuppannan Street,

   Paramathi Salai, Namakkal-637 002.                 ..3^rd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant           : M/s. K. Murugan

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent    : M/s. Propex Associates

For the 2^nd Respondent                : Sd called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 16.11.2021 and  this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                               

Docket order

 

          No representation for appellant. 1^st Respondent present.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of 1^st Respondent & for filing written argument of appellant & 1^st Respondent & for arguments in list. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.15 pm, then also the appellant  has not appeared and the written arguments were not filed. Hence keeping the appeal  pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the appeal  is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

 

 

              Sd/-                                                                               Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                       R.SUBBIAH                       

          MEMBER                                                                     PRESIDENT