NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1374/2014

C.V.S. SUDHIR BABU - Complainant(s)

Versus

ANUVILLA CO-OP HOUSING BOARD - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. V. MISHRA & CO.

16 May 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1374 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 03/02/2014 in Appeal No. 317/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. C.V.S. SUDHIR BABU
FLAT NO-303, ANUVILLA CHS, HISSA NO-4, SURVEY NO-19, PANVEL-MATHERAN ROAD, CHIPLE, VILLAGE,
PANVEL - 410206
MAHARASHTRA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. ANUVILLA CO-OP HOUSING BOARD
HISSA NO-4, SURVEY NO-19, PANVEL-MATHERAN ROAD, CHIPLE, VILLAGE,
PANVEL - 410206
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. V. Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. Sudhir Prabhu, Advocate

Dated : 16 May 2014
ORDER

PER JUSTICE J.M.MALIK

 

1.      Counsel for the parties present.  The State Commission dismissed the appeal and the following order was passed-

“None for the appellant even on second call.  Appeal is therefore dismissed for default.”

 

2.      We have perused the Revision Petition.  Para No. 8 of the R.P. runs as follows:-

 “8. That the above appeal i.e. FA/12/317 was listed before this Hon’ble State Commission, Maharashtra, at Mumbai was again listed on 3rd February 2014 but unfortunately the mother of the appellant Advocate expired and on next date the advocate on record was held up before the Labour Commissioner and couldn’t appear before the Hon’ble State Commission in time and the Hon’ble State Commission dismissed the appeal in default.”

3.      We have heard the counsel for the petitioner.  He submits that his mother had expired on 18.11.2013 and he was busy before the Labour Commissioner.  Counsel for the Respondent was present.  No intimation was given either to the Commission or to the opposite party Advocate.

4.      In the interest of justice, we restore the case subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as costs.  The said amount be paid to the opposite party Advocate, who appeared before the State Commission. 

 

 

5.      Subject to this, we hereby restore the case and direct the parties to appear before the State Commission for further proceedings on 07.07.2014.  The State Commission will expedite the case after satisfaction

that the above said costs stand paid to the Opposite Party counsel, thereafter, it will proceed further with this case.

6.      The Revision Petition stands disposed of.

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.