Uttar Pradesh

Agra-I

CCN 338/2005

MITLAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

ANUPAM TYAGI - Opp.Party(s)

08 Nov 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CCN 338/2005
 
1. MITLAL
S/O KHIRODA SAAB,POST AMBAJEET,THANA BADKA,DIST.HAZARI BAGH,JHARKHAND
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ANUPAM TYAGI
W/O RS TYAGI,F 603 KAMLA NAGAR,AGRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. UMESH CHAND PANDEY PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. ANSHUL GOYAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 08 Nov 2016
Final Order / Judgement

Case called out repeatedly. Complainant is absent. O.P. is present through Counsel. It appears from perusal of the record that complainant is not appearing since long back. It also reveals from perusal of the record that the presence of the complainant has been shown on few dates but, in fact, he was not present on those dates as, these order sheets have been signed by the Learned Counsel for the O.P. only. The written statement filed by the O.P. has not yet been taken on record. Since, the complainant is not appearing and prosecuting the present complaint, there appears no justification for further proceedings in this case. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Let record be consigned.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. UMESH CHAND PANDEY]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. ANSHUL GOYAL]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.