Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/152/2016

Sunil Kumar S/o Shree Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ansal Properties & Infrastructgure - Opp.Party(s)

Yashpal Rajheri

26 Oct 2017

ORDER

                                                                                                                C.C.No.152 of 2016.

Sunil Kumar Versus M/s. Ansal Properties etc.

 

Present:     Sh. Yash Pal Rajheri, Adv. for the complainant.

                  Sh. Hitesh Gambhir Adv. for the Ops.

 

                   Today this case was fixed for placing official record regarding EDC by the Ops.  However, the ld. Counsel for the complainant made statement to the effect that he due to technical defect withdraws the present complaint with the liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority. 

                        Keeping in view the statement made by ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.  However, the complainant is at liberty to file afresh complaint before the competent court/authority.  Exemption of time spent before this Forum is granted in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case titled “Laxmi Engineering Works versus PSG Industrial Institute  (1995) 3 SCC page 583”.  File be consigned to record room after due compliance.

Announced:

Dt.26.10.2017.

                                                                        President

 

                          Member       Member

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.