Haryana

StateCommission

EA/05/2015

Smt. Santosh Chaudhary - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ansal Properties - Opp.Party(s)

26 Apr 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

 

                                      Execution Application No.    05 of 2015

                                      In Complaint No.                             14 of 2015

                                      Date of the Institution:                    03.12.2015

                                      Date of Decision:                   26.04.2016

 

 

1.     Smt. Santosh Chaudhary wife of Shri Balram Chaudhry, Resident of R-193, Dera Baba Jaimal Singh Beas, Tehsil Baba Bakala, District Amritsar.

 

2.     Shri Neeraj Chaudhary s/o Sh. Balram Chaudhary, Resident of H.No.176, Sector-10, Panchkula.

                                      Decree Holders-Complainants

 

Versus

1.      M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructures Limited 115, Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi through its Director.

2.      Green Escape Kundli, Sonepat, District Sonepat through its Manager.

                                      Judgment Debtors-Opposite Parties

 

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

Present:-    Decree Holder- Neeraj Chaudhary in person with Shri D.C. Kumar, Advocate.

                   Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate for the Judgment Debtors 

                                                O R D E R

 

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          Neeraj Chaudhary- Decree Holder vide his separate statement (Annexure A) has stated that he has received cheques No.973471 to 973473 dated 25^th April, 2016 payable at Punjab National Bank (photocopies Annexures A-1 to A-3) amounting to Rs.38,24,045/- towards the awarded amount from Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited-opposite party. He has also received cash of Rs.10,000/- awarded as litigation expenses from the opposite party. The execution application be disposed of fully satisfied.

2.      In view of above, the execution application is disposed of being fully satisfied.

 

April 26th, 2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

U.K