NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2462/2024

SUSHANT GOLF CITY RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION - Complainant(s)

Versus

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MS. AKANSHA SRIVASTAVA

14 Oct 2024

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2462 OF 2024
(Against the Order dated 22/07/2024 in Appeal No. A/998/2023 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. SUSHANT GOLF CITY RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION
A4/263 SUSHANT GOLF CITY SHAHID PATH LUCKNOW THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR.
OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR SHOPPING SQUARE SECTOR-D SUSHANT GOLF CITY SULTANPUR ROAD LUCKNOW
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
2. ANSAL API INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
OFFICE AT BEHIND SHOPPING SQUARE SECTOR D SUSHANT GOLF CITY SULTANPUR ROAD LUCKNOW 226030
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 2463 OF 2024
(Against the Order dated 22/07/2024 in Appeal No. A/999/2023 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. SUSHANT GOLF CITY RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION
A-4/263 SUSHANT GOLF CITY SHAHID PATH LUCKNOW THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR.
OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR SHOPPING SQUARE SECTOR-D SUSHANT GOLF CITY SULTANPUR ROAD LUCKNOW-226030
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
2. ANSAL API INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
OFFICE AT BEHIND SHOPPING SQUARE SECTOR D SUSHANT GOLF CITY SULTANPUR ROAD LUCKNOW 226030
LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV,MEMBER

FOR THE PETITIONER :
FOR THE PETITIONER(S) : MR. RABIN MAJUMDER, ADVOCATE
MS. AKANSHA SRIVASTAVA, ADVOCATE
FOR THE RESPONDENT :
FOR THE CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT(S): MR. CHRITARTH PALLI, ADVOCATE
MR. TUSHAR MITTALL, ADVOCATE

Dated : 14 October 2024
ORDER

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner(s) submitted that he filed these Revision Petition(s) against the Order of the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short ‘State Commission’) dated 22.07.2024 wherein the execution of the Order of the Lucknow District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short ‘District Commission’) was stayed till the next date of hearing.  He submitted that there was no application filed for grant of stay and that this Appeal(s) had been filed with a delay of 280 days and the delay as so far not been condoned.

Heard the arguments of the learned Counsel for both the sides and perused the record.

The Order(s) of the State Commission is interim in nature. 

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner(s) shall place forth his arguments before the State Commission on (a) that at the outset the condonation of delay Application should be considered and (b) that stay shall be granted only on filing of a suitable application. 

Let the matter be heard by the State Commission on 21.10.2024 which shall decide the matter on merits.

Parties to appear before the State Commission on 21.10.2024 and put forth the respective submission.  The State Commission is expected to pass a clear Order in the matter and expeditiously dispose of the Appeal(s) as deemed fit. 

The Revision Petitions are accordingly disposed of.

Registry is directed to communicate this Order to the Registrar of the State Commission.

Order dasti.

 
............................
BINOY KUMAR
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
............................J
SAROJ YADAV
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.