Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/378/2012

Vikas Malik - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sandeep K sharma, Adv.

02 Aug 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 378 of 2012
1. Vikas Maliks/o Dr. Vinod Malil H.No. 4963, Pancham Society, Block D, Sector 68, Mohali ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.115, Ansal Bhawan, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi2. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure LtdChandigarh Office, SCO 183-184, Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 02 Aug 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.378 of 2012

 

 

Vikas Malik & anr.           Vs.     Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.                                                 & anr.

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Vipul Dharmani, Counsel for Complainants.

 

Dated the 2nd day of August, 2012

 

ORDER

 

           

            Sh.Vipul Dharmani-counsel for complainants has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainants reserve their right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the defect before the proper authority”

 

            In view of statement made by counsel for complainants, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the defect before the proper authority, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainants free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                         Sd/-                                         Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER