Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/79

Sub Engineer, KSEB - Complainant(s)

Versus

Anoop - Opp.Party(s)

S.Balachandran

20 Apr 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/10/79
(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/02/2009 in Case No. CC 07/08 of District Wayanad)
1. Sub Engineer, KSEB ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. Anoop ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENTHONORABLE SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA Member
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 

     COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

  I.A.166/2010 IN  APPEAL  NO:79/2010

 

                                ORDER DATED:20..04..2010

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                :  PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.M.K. ABDULLA SONA                                      : MEMBER

 

1.Sub Engineer,

  KSEB, Panamaram,

  Kalpetta.

 

2.Asst. Engineer,

  Electrical Section,                                             : PETITIONERS

  KSEB, Panamaram.

 

3.The Secretary,

  KSEB, TVPM.

 

(By Adv: Sri.S.Balachandran)

 

          Vs.

Anoop, S/o Late Padmaprabha,

Palakkunnu veedu, Madakkimala,                      : RESPONDENT

Anchukunnu, Wayanadu District.

 

                                      ORDER

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

                           

The delay  sought to be condoned is of 243 days.  In the affidavit filed in support of the complainant by the Assistant Engineer it is mentioned that he forwarded the order to the chief office in June 2009.  The chief office forwarded the same to the legal section in August 2009.  The chief office give sanction to file appeal and the order was communicated on 10/2/2010.  The delay was caused on account of pressure of work and administrative grounds and the time taken for getting sanction.

2. The respondent has filed objection.

3. We find that the affidavit filed is not a specific one.  It is not mentioned when the order was received and the date on which the order was forwarded to the chief office.  The date on which the chief office forwarded the same to the legal section is also not mentioned.

4. We find that in the circumstances the reasons mentioned for condoning the delay are not sufficient.  Hence the delay condonation petition is dismissed.  Hence the appeal is also dismissed.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

M.K. ABDULLA SONA : MEMBER

 

VL.

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 20 April 2010

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT[HONORABLE SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA]Member