West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/442/2021

Md. Hasan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Annas Akhter - Opp.Party(s)

Amal Kanti Das

26 Jul 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/442/2021
( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2021 )
 
1. Md. Hasan
25/1D Mofidul islam Lane, P.S. Beniapukur, Kolkata-700014.
2. Md. Shoaib
68/1/1B, Hare Krishna Konar Road also 27 Mofidul Islam Lane,P.S. Beniapukur,Kolkata-700014.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Annas Akhter
68/1/1B, Hare Krishna Konar Road also 27 Mofidul Islam Lane,P.S. Beniapukur,Kolkata-700014.
2. Nilufar Salauddin
68/1/1B, Hare Krishna Konar Road also 27 Mofidul Islam Lane,P.S. Beniapukur,Kolkata-700014.
3. imtiaz Ali
7/H/8, Ahiripukur Second Lane, P.S. Koraya, Kolkata-700019.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Amal Kanti Das, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 26 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT           

SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR MAHANTY,   PRESIDENT

 

Brief facts of the case are that the OPs 1, 2 and One Arbi Begum are the owners of a piece and parcel  of land measuring about 02 Cottahs situated within Ward No. 16 of  KMC being Premises No. 68/1/1B,  Hare Krishna, Konar Road, Kolkata-700014.   OP-3 is a Developer who agreed to construct a G+4 storied building on the said land. The Complainants and the Constituted Attorney of the vendors executed an Agreement for Sale dated 14.02.2018. By the said agreement, the vendors agreed to sell 500 sq. ft. of area consisting of 2 BHK,  one  Drawing cum Dinning Room, one Kitchen, a covered varanda and Bath and Privy at a sale price of Rs. 15,00,000/-. In terms of the Agreement for Sale, the OPs are liable to handover peaceful possession of the subject flat to the complainants within 31.12.2020. Complainants have already paid Rs. 13,00,000/- to the OP-3 being the Constituted Attorney of the owners. It is further agreed that the complainants will pay the balance sale price of Rs. 2,00,000/- at the time of execution of Deed of Conveyance and delivery of possession of the subject flat. The complainants are ready and willing to pay balance sale price but the OPs did not execute Deed of Conveyance and deliver peaceful possession of the subject flat in habitable condition on receiving balance sale price. The OPs deprived the complainants for which the complainants have suffered mental pain and agony. Having no other alternative, the complainants issued legal notice dated 29.11.2021 to the OPs but such notice was unattended. Alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice the complainants filed the present case against the OPs.

            Despite service of notices of the complaint, the OPs did not turn  up to contest the case by filing WV within the statutory period as provided under the CP Act,  2019. Thus, the case runs ex parte against the OPs.

            Complainant No. 2,  Md. Shoaib has filed evidence by way of affidavit wherein  he has reiterated all the averments taken in the complaint and relied the documents annexed with the complaint petition. We have heard the Ld. Advocate appearing for the complainants and also perused the material available on record as well as written argument.  

In course of hearing the Ld. Advocate for the complainants  submitted that  there is a gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OPs.  Despite receiving 90 % of sale price, they  did not execute and register Deed of Conveyance as well as deliver peaceful possession of the subject flat to the complainants . It is prayed that the consumer complaint should be allowed in terms of the prayer.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the various pleas raised by the Ld. Advocate of the complainants and find that the Constituted Attorney of the vendors executed an Agreement for Sale dated 14.02.2018 with the complainants. By virtue of the said agreement, the OPs agreed to sell a flat measuring about 500 sq. ft. little more or less consisting of  2 bed rooms,  one Drawing Cum Dining Room, one Kitchen, a Covered Varanda and one Bath and privy on the second floor of the proposed of  G+4 storied building at sale price of Rs. 15,00,000/-. The complainants have paid Rs.  13,00,000/- to the OP-3 out of total sale price of Rs.15,00,000/- . Despite several request and legal notice dated 29.11.2021, the OPs failed and neglected to handover physical possession of the subject flat as well as did not execute and register Deed of Conveyance in favour of the complainants in spite of payment of  Rs. 13,00,000/-.  The complainants are ready and willing to pay the balance consideration amount to the OPs on the date of execution and registration of the Deed of Conveyance  and delivery of possession of the subject flat. The OPs did not avoid the terms and conditions  of the Agreement for Sale .

It is the duty of the OPs to execute and register Deed of Conveyance  and delivery of possession of the subject flat to the complainants  after receiving balance sale price of Rs. 2,00,000/-. OPs did not file WV denying the allegation of the complainants as made out in the complaint petition. Complainants cannot be made to wait indefinitely for execution and registration of the Deed of Conveyance and receiving possession of the subject flat. Thus, the Commission has authority to pass appropriate order in this complaint case.

It is settle law that the complainants being the purchasers of the subject flat for residential purpose is ”Consumers” under the provision of Consumer Protection Act,  2019. We also find both deficiency in service within the meaning of section 2 (11) and unfair trade practice within the meaning of section 2 (47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to be well and truly evident on the part of the OPs.

In view of the above discussion, the present consumer complaint is allowed in part ex parte against the OPs with the following directions:-

  1. OPs are directed to execute and register Deed of Conveyance and delivery of  physical possession of the subject flat fully mentioned in  schedule  of the complaint petition measuring about 500 sq. ft. on the 2nd  floor of the G+4 storied building situated at KMC Premises No. 68/1/1B, Hare Krishna, Konar Road, Kolkata-700014 inhabitable condition to the complainants on receiving balance sale price of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs) only.
  2. OPs are  also directed to issue possession letter of the subject flat  and completion certificate of the building  to the complainants.
  3. OPs are further  jointly and severally directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only as litigation cost to the complainants.   

The OPs are directed to comply the above order within a period of 90 days from today and the complainants shall pay the balance sale price of Rs.  2,00,000/-  on the date of execution and registeration of the Deed of Conveyance and delivery of possesion of the subject flat. Complainants will bear cost of stamp duty and registration charges for execution and registration of Deed of Conveyance .

Copy of the judgment be supplied to the parties as per CP Act. Judgment be uploaded on the website of this Commission forthwith for perusal of the parties.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.