PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER 1. Counsel for the parties heard. 2. The petitioner has filed an affidavit wherein it is stated that they are ready to pay the sum of Rs. 45,000/-. The same is reproduced as follows: -2- “I say in view of the above and as the position stands today in terms of the Resolution No. 288 dated 02.08.2012 of the petitioner society, the complainant/respondent is only entitled to a refund of Rs. 45,000/- after deducting a sum of Rs. 25,000/- as per the provision of Rule 20.6(ii) on unconditional withdrawal from the Scheme, and not Rs. 70,000/- as awarded / ordered by the District Consumer Forum, New Delhi in terms of the impugned judgment dated 16.02.2012. I say as per the records of the petitioner herein total amount recoverable from the complainant/respondent is Rs. 6,33,457, as reflected in the calculation sheet enclosed hereto annexed as Annexure A-10”. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent/complainant should be given Rs. 45,000/- with interest from the date of deposit of the said amount and some compensation. 4. As per this agreement, it is hereby, ordered that the petitioner / opposite party will pay a sum of Rs. 45,000/- with interest @ 9% from the date of deposit till its realization within sixty days or else, it will carry interest @ 11% till its realization. Costs of Rs. 5,000/- are also awarded in favour of the complaint because when the opposite party agreed that -3- it was ready to pay Rs. 45,000/- they should have sent a cheque in his favour from the very start. There is some kind of harassment and mental agony for which the compensation is being granted. The amount already deposited by the petitioner along with accrued interest can be withdrawn after the payment of the amount. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. | 
