The delay of 310 days in filing the Revision Petition has sufficiently been explained. The delay is condoned and the Revision Petition is treated to have been filed within limitation. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners and perused the impugned order dated 18.01.2018, passed by the Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Patna (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), whereby the Appeal preferred by the Petitioners has been partly allowed and the Petitioners have been directed to pay to the Respondent/Complainant a sum of ₹3,37,500/- being the 75% of the insured value on non-standard basis towards loss on account of theft of the vehicle in question. The findings recorded by the Fora below are based on appreciation of material and evidence on record as also the decisions of this Commission in United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Ramgarh Cantt Branch, Through Dy. Manager v. Ravi Kant Gopalka, Prop. of Chhotanagpur Finance Corpn. (MANU/CF/0186/2007) and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dhanraj Surana (2017 SCC OnLine NCDRC 568). In view of the above, the order passed by the State Commission does not suffer from any illegality, warranting interference in exercise of our revisional jurisdiction. The Revision Petition is dismissed. | 
