Telangana

Nalgonda

CC/181/2014

Poreddy Shankar Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank - Opp.Party(s)

T.Venkat Reddy

30 Dec 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
NALGONDA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/181/2014
 
1. Poreddy Shankar Reddy
Kuda Kuda (Vi), of Chivemla (M),
Nalgonda
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank
Kudakuda Road Branch, Suryapet
Nalgonda
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.PRATHAP KUMAR PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy Member
 HON'BLE MRS. CH.A.LATHA KUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 30 Dec 2014
Final Order / Judgement

    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT NALGONDA

 

       PRESENT:  SRI G.PRATHAP KUMAR,

                       FAC PRESIDENT.

                                                                               

                       SMT.CH.A.LATHA KUMARI,

                       MEMBER.

 

                       SRI K.VINODH REDDY,

                       MEMBER.

 

. . .

 

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No. 181 OF 2014

 

Between: 

 

     Poreddy Shankar Reddy S/o Ram Reddy, Aged: 62 years,

     Occ: Retired Senior Technician from NFC, R/o Kuda Kuda Village

     of Chivemla Mandal, Nalgonda District.

                                                                                                         …Complainant.

 

                                                And

 

 

 

1) Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, Kudakuda Road Branch,

    Suryapet, Nalgonda District. Rep.by its Branch Manager.

 

2) State Bank of India, Suryapet Branch, Nalgonda District.

    Represented by its Sector Manager.

 

                                                                                               …OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

 

        This complaint  coming on before us for final hearing on this day, in the presence of Sri T.Venkat Reddy, Advocate for the Complainant,  and  on perusing the material papers on record, the Forum passed the following:

 

 

ORDER

 

        The Complainant is present and he made an endorsement that complaint not pressed, counsel for the Complainant is also identified the Complainant.  Hence the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

 

 

Written and corrected by me and pronounced by us in the open Forum  on this 30th day of December, 2014.

 

 

 

 

MEMBER                             MEMBER                        FAC PRESIDENT

 

 

 

               

 

 

                                

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.PRATHAP KUMAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MRS. CH.A.LATHA KUMARI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.