Haryana

Ambala

CC/228/2020

Ram Aggarwal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Andhra Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Sunil Bhatia

15 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.         :    228 of 2020.

                                                          Date of Institution           :     08.10.2020.

                                                          Date of decision    :     15.09.2022.

 

Ram Aggarwal son of Shri Garib Dass, resident of VPO Karasan, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala, Haryana.

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

1.  Andhra Bank, Chota Korwa, VPO Korwa Khurd, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala Haryana (Through its Branch Manager/Authorized Representative)

2.  Andhra Bank Zonal Bank, 1st Floor, Hotel Shivalik View, Sector-17-E, Chandigarh (Through its Chairman/Managing Director/Director (s)/ Regional Manager/Branch Manager/Authorized Representative)

3.  Bank of India, Harbhanpur Branch, Saurikh Khadni, District Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh (Through its Branch Manager/Authorized Representative)

4.  Bank of India (Head Office), Star House, C-5, G Block, Bandrakurla Complex, Mumbai, Maharashtra (Through its Chairman/Managing Director/Director (s)/ Regional Manager/Branch Manager/Authorized Representative).

 

                                                                                  ….…. Opposite Parties.      

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member,

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.         

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

          Shri Nikhilesh Bhagi, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.1 & 2.

          Shri Ankush Gupta, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.3 and 4.

 

          Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

 

Order:-       Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of costs of Rs.600/- in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even from the last three dates of hearing i.e. 13.07.2022, 23.08.2022 and 30.08.2022, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced:-15.09.2022.

 

 

Member                                    Member                                    President

                   DCDRC, Ambala

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.