Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/756/05

GANDAM SREERAMA MURTHY - Complainant(s)

Versus

ANDHRA BANK - Opp.Party(s)

MR.K.RAMA KRISHNA

11 Jun 2009

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/756/05
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)
 
1. GANDAM SREERAMA MURTHY
R/O F.NO.210 SAPHIRE COMPLEX BEHIND TOPAZ BLDG AMRUTHA HILLS PUNJAGUTTA HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ANDHRA BANK
CHAIRMAN CENTRAL OFFICE SAIFABAD HYD
Andhra Pradesh
2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD
SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER D.O.IV CHURCH BUILDINGS TILAK ROAD HYD
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD.

 

FA.No.756/2005 against  C.D.No.1/2000, District Forum-I, HYDERABAD.

 

Between:

Gandam Sreerama Murthy,

S/o.Satyanarayana, aged about 42 years,

Occ:Unemployee, R/o.Flat No.210,

Saphire Complex, Behind Topaz Bldg.,

Amrutha Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad.                               ..Appellant/Complainant

 

            And

 

1. The Chairman,

    Andhra Bank,

    Central office, Saifabad,

    Hyderabad-04.

2. The Zonal Manager,

     Andhra Bank, Zonal Office,

    Kothi, Hyderabad.

3. The Chief Manager,

     Andhra Bank, Zonal Office,

     Hyderabad-082.

4. The Sr.Divisional Manager,

     United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,

     D.O.IV, Church Building,

     Tilak Road, Hyderabad-001.                                          Respondents/Opp.parties.

 

For the Appellant: Appellant appeared in person.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Counsel for the Respondents. Mr.T.Durga Reddy.

 

QUORUM: SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER

AND

                            SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, MEMBER..

     

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE,

TWO THOUSAND NINE

 

ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Syed Abdullah,  Member.)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ***

 

           The appellant filed a memo withdrawing the appeal.  The memo is recorded. In view of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of Commission.  There shall be no order as to costs.

 

                                                                             MEMBER.

 

                                                                               MEMBER.

                                                                                      Dt.11-6-2009.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.