View 173 Cases Against Amrapali
DR. DEBASISH CHAUDHURI filed a consumer case on 25 Jul 2018 against AMRAPALI LEISURE VALLY PVT. LTD. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is CC/1966/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 24 Aug 2018.
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI
(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)
Date of Arguments : 25.07.2018
Date of Decision :30.07.2018
COMPLAINT NO.1966/2017
In the matter of:
Dr. Debasish Chaudhuri,
S/o. Shri A.K. Chaudhuri,
R/o. National Research Fellow at PDUNASS,
30-31, Institutional Area,
Janak Puri, New Delhi-110058. .........Complainant
Versus
M/s. Amarpali Leisure Valley Pvt. Ltd.
Regd. Office at 307,
Rd Floor, Nipun Tower,
Plot No.15, Community Centre,
Karkardooma, Delhi-110032.
Also at Corporate Office:
C-56/40, Sector-62,
Noida (Uttar Pradesh).
Through its Directors : Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma,
Mr. Akhil Kumar Sureka and Mr. Suvash Chandra Kumar
…….Opposite Party
CORAM
Hon’ble Sh. O. P. Gupta, Member (Judicial)
Hon’ble Sh. Anil Srivastava, Member
1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes/No
Shri O.P. Gupta, Member (Judicial)
ORDER
Vide this order we shall be dealing with the question of effect of moratorium granted by National Company Law Tribunal vide order dated 04.09.2017 passed in company petition no.1(B)-121 (PB)/2017 titled as Bank of Baroda vs. Amarpali Silicon City (P) Ltd.
The present complaint is at the stage of admission itself. The counsel for complainant states that aforesaid order pertains to another project of the OP namely Amarpali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd.
However copy of order dated 27.03.2018 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in WP(Civil) N.940/17 titled as Bikram Chaterji and others vs. Union Bank of India reveals that Hon’ble Supreme Court is dealing with following 9 projects of OP:-
The same indicates that moratorium must be in respect of all the above projects.
Still further the moratorium is in respect of Amarpali Zodiac Developers Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 16.02.2018 passed by National Company Law Tribunal in Company Petition No.1(B)/238 PB/2017 titled as Sidhi Interiors Pvt. Ltd. vs. Amarpali Zodiac Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Still further similar question regarding effect of moratorium against Jai Prakash Infra Tech on cases against Jai Prakash Associates came up before National Commission in Consumer Case No.629/2017 titled as Jai Prakash Singh Khurana vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. which was dealt with order dated 04.12.2017. The same reads as below:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for complainants however insisted that the complainant can proceed against Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., that no observations to the contrary were made by the Hon’ble Apex Court. In these circumstances, I feel that it would only be appropriate if the parties are directed to seek order of Hon’ble Supreme Court as to whether in view of the order of Hon’ble Apex Court dated 11.09.2017 the proceedings against Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. can continue before this Commission or not, in the matter in which the land on which the flats were to be constructed, is stated to be owned by Jai Prakash Infra Tech Ltd.
In the above background, we feel it appropriate if the complainant is directed to seek clarifications from Hon’ble Supreme Court or National Company Law Tribunal as to whether proceedings against M/s. Amarpali Smart City Developers Pvt. Ltd. can continue or not.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties free of cost.
List on 04.01.2019.
(ANIL SRIVASTAVA) (O.P. GUPTA)
MEMBER MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
nk
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.