Tanisha Vs. Amity University

Present:       Shri Chander Mohan Rathi, Advocate for the complainant.     

                   Sh. Vinod Wadhwa, Adv. for OP No. 1.

                   Sh. Gaurav Arya, Adv. for OP N o. 2.       

                   Vakalatnama filed on behalf of OP No. 1. Ld. counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to some technical defects in the case, he does not want to proceed with the present complaint and as such has stated to withdraw the same and has sought permission to file the case in proper Court of law on same cause of action and permission u/s 14(2) of Limitation Act. Statement has been recorded separately.

          In view of the above statement present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant is at liberty to seek the remedy in appropriate Court of law. The exemption/condonation of delay under section 14 (2) of the Limitation Act is also allowed. Original documents if any placed on record by the complainant be returned and photocopy of the same be placed on record. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Member                          Member                      President

DCDRC, Rohtak/13.03.2023