West Bengal

Kolkata Unit-IV

CC/112/2022

SIDDARTHA GHOSH AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

AMITAVA SAMANTA AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

29 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION

Sealdah Court Room No. 302 and 309

1,Beliaghata Road, Kolkata-14

 

 

Complaint Case No. CC/112/2022

( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2022 )

 

1. SIDDHARTHA GHOSH,

S/O LATE SUDHIR KUMAR GHOSH 36/4,SARAT GHOSH GARDEN ROAD,

P.S.-KASBA,KOLKATA-700031

WB

2. PRABIR KUMAR GHOSH

S/O LATE SUSANTA KR. GHOSH VILLAGE & POST DAKSHIN GOBINDAPUR,

P.S.-BARUIPORE, VIA MALANCHA MAHANAGAR

SOUTH 24 PGS

WB

...........Complainant(s)

  

Versus

 

1. AMITAVA SAMANTA,

S/O LATE DILIP KUMAR SAMANTA 1/2,PURBACHAL NEBEDITA ROAD,P.S.-KASBA,KOLKATA-700078

WB

2. M/S INDIA GREEN REALITY(P) LIMITED

BA-30,RAJDANGA MAIN ROAD,P.S.-KASBA, KOLKATA-700107 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI AMITAVA SAMANTA S/O LT. DILIP KUMAR SAMANTA AT C/5A,RAMKRISHNA UPANIBESH ,GROUND FLOOR,P.S.-JADAVPUR, KOLKATA-700092 AT PRESENT ½  , PURBACHAL NEBEDITA ROAD, P.S.-KASBA, KOLKATA-700078,

SOUTH 24 PGS

WB

............Opp.Party(s)

 

BEFORE:

 

 

HON'BLE MR. SUDIP NIYOGI                                                  PRESIDENT

 

HON'BLE MRS. MANJUSRI SARKAR CHOWDHURY        MEMBER

 

HON'BLE MR. AYAN SINHA                                                     MEMBER

 

PRESENT: Smt. Swarnali Mukherjee, Ld. Advocate for the complainant

 

Dated : 29 Nov 2022

Judgement

 

MRS. MANJUSRI SARKAR CHOWDHURY                                MEMBER

This case arises out of a complaint u/s 35 read with Section 38 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

            The fact of the case, in short, is that the complainants had booked one two storied bungalow of 1344 sq. ft named “Dopati” (G+1) Unit No. 143 of area measuring about 1344 sq. ft. more or less having with structure area ad measuring about 907 sq. ft. , L.R Khatian No. 553, 554 Bidhyadharpur Road, J. L. No. 35 within P.S- Panrui, Distrcit- Birbhum, launched by the Opposite Parties for a consideration of Rs.21,00,000/-.

 

            The agreement for sale was executed between the parties on 15/02/2014 and complainants paid Rs.8,20,000/- in total by making payment from time to time. Complainants visited the site to see the progress but she realized that the Opposite Parties are not in a position to complete the project and hand over the same within 24 months from the date of the agreement for sale, as per terms and conditions of the agreement.

 

           

 

          So, complainants issued legal notice on 04/03/2022 for delivery of possession of the said bungalow and execution of the deed of conveyance or alternatively refund of the amount, which was paid for the said flat along with interest @ 18 % p.a.

 

            The complainants alleged in their petition that the Opposite Parties have deliberately/ dishonestly committed the beach of agreement by not delivering the possession of bungalow and thus, being fed up with such conduct of the Opposite Parties, the complainants filed this case.

 

            Notices were served upon both the Opposite Parties, but they did not contest this case by filing written version and so, the matter was heard ex parte against them.

 

            We have gone through the petition of complaint which was also treated as evidence on the prayer of the complainants. Thereafter, the matter was fixed for final hearing and Brief Notes on Argument was also filed along with certain original documents by the complainants in support of their contentions.

 

DECISION WITH REASONS

 

        From the case of the complainants, it is found that they are ‘Consumers’ as per Section 2 (7) (11) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

            On perusal of the money receipts produced by the complainants, it is found that they had paid-

            Dt. 21/03/2013 – Rs.1,00,000/-

            Dt. 13/04/2013 – Rs.2,15,000/-

            Dt. 15/02/2014 – Rs. 1,05,000/-

            Dt. 29/06/2015 – Rs.4,00,000/-

                           In total  Rs.8,20,000/- .

 

                        The said money receipts (4 in numbers) were issued by the Opposite Parties.

 

            We have carefully considered the evidence, documents filed in support of their case and also considered the arguments made on behalf of the complainants.

 

            The allegations of the complainants remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

 

            We find the complainants made alternative prayer in their petition of complaint in the form of execution and registration of a deed of conveyance or refund of the money advanced by them.

            However, having heard the submissions made on behalf of the complainants we find it to be appropriate to pass an order of refund. 

 

            Therefore, we hold that the complainants are entitled to refund of the amount of Rs.8,20,000/- which was paid by them to the Opposite Parties.

           

Considering the prayer of the complainants for compensation and cost of litigation, in our view, payment of interest @ 10 % on the said amount i.e. Rs.8,20,000/- along with litigation cost of Rs.5,000/- it would be just and appropriate.

 

            Since interest is allowed on the said amount of Rs.8,20,000/-, we are not inclined to pass any order of compensation separately.

 

 

 

 

 

Hence,       it    is

                                                               ORDERED

 

That the instant complaint be and the same is being allowed ex parte against the OPs.

            OPs are directed to pay Rs.8,20,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Twenty Thousand Only) along with interest @ 10 % to the complainants from the date of last money receipt issued by the Opposite Parties i.e. 29/06/2015, until realization in full.

 

            Opposite Parties are further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) as litigation cost of the complainants.

 

            Both the Opposite Parties are to pay the aforesaid awarded amount to the complainants within 45 days from the date of this order.

 

            Both the Opposite Parties are jointly and severally liable to pay the said amount to the complainants.

 

If the aforesaid order is not complied by the Opposite Parties within the above said period of time, the complainants shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

 

Dictated and corrected by me

 

 

[HON'BLE MR. SUDIP NIYOGI]

            Member                                                                                                         PRESIDENT

 

 

[HON'BLE MRS. MANJUSRI SARKAR CHOWDHURY]

MEMBER

 

 

[HON'BLE MR. AYAN SINHA]

MEMBER

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.