Haryana

StateCommission

RP/44/2016

TATA SKY LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

AMIT KUMAR GUPTA - Opp.Party(s)

VAIBHAV JAIN

10 Aug 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                Revision Petition No.   44 of 2016

                                                Date of Institution:       08.06.2016

                                                Date of Decision:         10.08.2016

  

 

1.      Tata Sky Limited having its registered office at 3^rd Floor, C-1, Wadia International Centre, (Bombay Dyeing) Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli Street, Mumbai, State Maharashtra (400025) India through its Manager.

2.      Tata Sky Limited having its registered office at 3^rd Floor, C-1, Wadia International Centre, (Bombay Dyeing) Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli Street, Mumbai, State Maharashtra (400025) India through its Managing Director/Chairman.

3.      Tata Sky Limited having its registered office at 3^rd Floor, C-1, Wadia International Centre, (Bombay Dyeing) Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli Street, Mumbai, State Maharashtra (400025) India through its Manager Customer Care Department.

Petitioners-Opposite Parties No.1 to 3

 

Versus

 

1.      Amit Kumar Gupta son of Sh. Ramesh Chand, resident of House No.1149, Sector 26, District Panchkula.

Respondent-Complainant

 

2.      The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, SCO 114, Sector 25, District Panchkula.

Respondent-opposite party No.4

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

Present :    Sh. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for the petitioners

                   Sh. Amit Gupta, respondent No.1-complainant in person

                   Ms. Meenu Kohli, Senior Manager, on behalf of  respondent No.2-Punjab National Bank.

 

O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          By filing this revision petition, Tata Sky Limited-opposite parties No.1 to 3 (petitioners) has challenged the order dated April 29^th, 2016 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (for short ‘District Forum), whereby, their defence was struck off for non-filing of reply.

2.      Sh. Amit Gupta, respondent No.1-complainant has stated that he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside. 

3.      In view of above, this revision petition is accepted and the impugned order is set aside.  Consequently, the petitioners are accorded opportunity to file reply on the date fixed before the District Forum, that is, August 22^nd, 2016.

4.      Copy of this order be sent to the District Forum.

 

Announced: 10.08.2016

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(B.M. Bedi) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

 

UK